What Republicans Need To Get Among Women to Win: 46%

This is not another piece talking about the GOP challenges among women voters.  Nor is this another piece analyzing the data about the gender gap.  Those are important to do, but this does not attempt to do that.  These blog posts do a great job of that.
https://pos.org/2014/06/winning-women-what-republicans-can-do-in-2014/
https://pos.org/2014/06/winning-women-what-republicans-can-do-in-2014-2/
https://pos.org/2014/06/winning-women-what-republicans-can-do-in-2014-3/

Instead, this asks the question – what is the difference in terms of vote support among women between Republican candidates who win and Republican candidates who lose.  Aaron Blake’s interesting article on June 19th in The Fix got me thinking about what is the difference between a Republican who wins a close race and a Republican who loses.

In my analysis of the numbers, it became clear that it is not so much the size of the gender gap that matters, but the percentage that the Republican candidate gets of the women’s vote.  I had my intern, Maddy Bolger (it’s great to have one of my daughters working for me!), pull all of the Senate race results for 2010 and 2012, and pull all of the available exit polls for any race where the winner received 55{09f965da52dc6ab4c1643a77bd40d1f729d807040cd8db540234bb981a782222} of the vote or less.

And, what did I find?  In the 18 Senate races in 2010-12 where the winner received 55{09f965da52dc6ab4c1643a77bd40d1f729d807040cd8db540234bb981a782222} or less, and there were exit polls, anytime a Republican candidate got 46{09f965da52dc6ab4c1643a77bd40d1f729d807040cd8db540234bb981a782222} or more of the major party vote among women, that Republican won (seven times).  Anytime a Republican candidate received 45{09f965da52dc6ab4c1643a77bd40d1f729d807040cd8db540234bb981a782222} or less of the major party vote, the Republican lost (eleven times).

So, that makes 46{09f965da52dc6ab4c1643a77bd40d1f729d807040cd8db540234bb981a782222} the magic number.

Remember, this is the major party vote.  So, for instance, in Nevada’s 2012 U.S. Senate race, Dean Heller lost women 42{09f965da52dc6ab4c1643a77bd40d1f729d807040cd8db540234bb981a782222}-48{09f965da52dc6ab4c1643a77bd40d1f729d807040cd8db540234bb981a782222} to Shelley Berkley.  However, since only 90{09f965da52dc6ab4c1643a77bd40d1f729d807040cd8db540234bb981a782222} of women voted for either Heller OR Berkley, he actually lost the major party vote 46.6{09f965da52dc6ab4c1643a77bd40d1f729d807040cd8db540234bb981a782222} to 53.4{09f965da52dc6ab4c1643a77bd40d1f729d807040cd8db540234bb981a782222} – above the 45{09f965da52dc6ab4c1643a77bd40d1f729d807040cd8db540234bb981a782222} Mendoza line for Republican candidates.

The only two Republican winners of the last two cycles who received a majority of the vote among women in the major party vote were Roy Blunt (53{09f965da52dc6ab4c1643a77bd40d1f729d807040cd8db540234bb981a782222} of major party vote among women) and Marco Rubio (67{09f965da52dc6ab4c1643a77bd40d1f729d807040cd8db540234bb981a782222}).  The Rubio number is a little misleading – he earned 44{09f965da52dc6ab4c1643a77bd40d1f729d807040cd8db540234bb981a782222} of women, but because Charlie Crist received more votes than the Democratic nominee, Kendrick Meeks (I named him so you didn’t have to Google the 2010 Democratic Senate candidate’s name!), Meeks only polled 22{09f965da52dc6ab4c1643a77bd40d1f729d807040cd8db540234bb981a782222} of women.

chart 1

The lowest any losing Republican in competitive races got of the major party vote among women was 41{09f965da52dc6ab4c1643a77bd40d1f729d807040cd8db540234bb981a782222} – that happened to three candidates.  The three races have nothing in common – Colorado 2010, Massachusetts 2012, and Pennsylvania 2012.

The data shows that Republicans do not have to win women to win close Senate races.  If that were the case, GOPers would have won five fewer seats in the Senate in the last two cycles.  But, it does show that 46{09f965da52dc6ab4c1643a77bd40d1f729d807040cd8db540234bb981a782222} is the magic number among women voters who cast their vote for either major party.

The goal for Republicans should be to get 47-48{09f965da52dc6ab4c1643a77bd40d1f729d807040cd8db540234bb981a782222} of the major party vote among women, which really underscores how important doing well among women voters is to increasing the odds of Republicans winning back the Senate.  Obviously, if women are 54{09f965da52dc6ab4c1643a77bd40d1f729d807040cd8db540234bb981a782222} of the electorate, the GOPer needs 48{09f965da52dc6ab4c1643a77bd40d1f729d807040cd8db540234bb981a782222} of women, compared to the 46{09f965da52dc6ab4c1643a77bd40d1f729d807040cd8db540234bb981a782222} they need if women are a 52{09f965da52dc6ab4c1643a77bd40d1f729d807040cd8db540234bb981a782222} share of the voters.

Similar Articles

  • POS National Poll Release #3 – Socialist Trends
    read more

  • POS National Poll Release #2 – Israel
    read more

  • POS National Poll Release #1 – Trump Approval/Generic Ballot
    read more

  • Looking at ideology by party over the last thirty years
    read more

  • Who’s watching? A look at the demographics of cable news channel watchers
    read more

Public Opinion Strategies helped us to clarify what we wanted to learn and then conducted research and analysis that shed light even beyond the questions we set out to ask. They were very receptive to our suggestions, responsive to our queries, and flexible when we needed them to be.

Public Opinion Strategies has consistently offered unparalleled advice and spot-on polling that has shaped how and where we spent money and deploy key resources. Additionally, they have always been an excellent steward of limited campaign resources, ensuring we spend wisely and not a dollar more than necessary in order to get the information we need.

Robert Blizzard and Public Opinion Strategies did a great job for us throughout our successful campaign for Congress. Robert gave us accurate data, spot on analysis, and professional advice, all of which were essential to our victory.

Public Opinion Strategies is one of our go-to pollsters when it comes to testing public support for bond ballot measures and other initiative proposals. They are available to provide ongoing consultation with regard to crafting of ballot questions, public outreach messaging, and related efforts.

ACLI has worked with Public Opinion Strategies for decades, through several tough industry battles—often ones in which public opinion does not naturally fall on the side of insurers. Yet Bill and his team consistently provide invaluable strategic advice by refining our messages and helping us frame our issues in a way that makes them understandable and persuasive.

The data from Public Opinion Strategies provided important insight and informed our public awareness campaign. We sincerely appreciate their professionalism and expertise in this arena.

Nicole McCleskey and the team at Public Opinion Strategies have been invaluable to me, both during my campaigns and as Governor of the State of New Mexico. It’s not just the accuracy of their numbers, but guiding the overall strategy that makes them so valuable.

Public Opinion Strategies has been a part of our team in Missouri for more than a decade. With their data and guidance, Republicans here were able to attain a majority in the House in 2002 for the first time in fifty years, and we have been able to grow that majority to the point that we now have a record, veto-proof majority.

In my tenure at two leading business associations, facing huge and complex consumer issues, I have benefitted enormously from the objective advisory skills of Bill and his team. They do their homework, they are rigorous, dispassionate and thoughtful. Turning questions into answers is a clever tag, but it’s also an apt description of the professional talents of the firm.

I consider Public Opinion Strategies to be a part of our team. That is the way we have always worked. They have helped us to understand our needs and fashioned research solutions to meet those needs. They have helped us to meet killer deadlines by being flexible, executing rapidly, and insuring quality. Teamwork is the best way to describe it.

Accuracy, speed, and deep knowledge of key issues and public sentiment are the hallmarks of quality opinion research, and on these measures Public Opinion Strategies consistently delivers. I have had the pleasure of working with Public Opinion Strategies for more than 15 years on dozens of issues, and they are undoubtedly the gold standard.

Public Opinion Strategies’ track record of success and wealth of experience in political campaigns and issue advocacy are why they are one of the most trusted and well respected public opinion firms in Washington, D.C. Their insights and perspectives have helped to inform a wide array of public affairs activities across multiple industries.