Voters Across Age Groups are United in their Opposition to Military Action in Syria

In the August 28-29 national survey for NBC/Wall Street Journal (conducted jointly by Bill McInturff of Public Opinion Strategies and Fred Yang of Hart Research Associates), the numbers on Syria were clearly challenging for the President. Less than two weeks later, the numbers on the three questions that were tested again were decidedly worse.

chart 1

Especially problematic for the President is that opposition to military action in Syria crosses almost all demographic subgroups, including the age groups (age 18-34 and age 65+) where we often see a significant generational difference.

Key Syria Data by Age

Adults Age 18-34 (28{09f965da52dc6ab4c1643a77bd40d1f729d807040cd8db540234bb981a782222}) Adults Age 65+ (15{09f965da52dc6ab4c1643a77bd40d1f729d807040cd8db540234bb981a782222})
Military Action in Syria in our National Interest 25{09f965da52dc6ab4c1643a77bd40d1f729d807040cd8db540234bb981a782222} Yes, in National Interest/
44{09f965da52dc6ab4c1643a77bd40d1f729d807040cd8db540234bb981a782222} No, Not in National Interest
19{09f965da52dc6ab4c1643a77bd40d1f729d807040cd8db540234bb981a782222} Yes, in National Interest/
46{09f965da52dc6ab4c1643a77bd40d1f729d807040cd8db540234bb981a782222} No, Not In National Interest
Congress Vote on Military Action 32{09f965da52dc6ab4c1643a77bd40d1f729d807040cd8db540234bb981a782222} Should Approve of Action/
58{09f965da52dc6ab4c1643a77bd40d1f729d807040cd8db540234bb981a782222} Should Not Approve of Action
29{09f965da52dc6ab4c1643a77bd40d1f729d807040cd8db540234bb981a782222} Should Approve of Action/
58{09f965da52dc6ab4c1643a77bd40d1f729d807040cd8db540234bb981a782222} Should Not Approve of Action
If Only Limited Air Strikes 42{09f965da52dc6ab4c1643a77bd40d1f729d807040cd8db540234bb981a782222} Support/
53{09f965da52dc6ab4c1643a77bd40d1f729d807040cd8db540234bb981a782222} Oppose
42{09f965da52dc6ab4c1643a77bd40d1f729d807040cd8db540234bb981a782222} Support/
51{09f965da52dc6ab4c1643a77bd40d1f729d807040cd8db540234bb981a782222} Oppose

 

As the above table demonstrates, the data is close to identical among younger adults and seniors on whether Congress should vote to approve military action, as well as if there would be support for military action if it was limited to air strikes. There is more of a difference on the question of whether or not military action would be in our national interest, but the data is still quite similar.

One question where we did see a distinct difference among younger adults and seniors is on whether or not President Obama has made a convincing case about the need for the United States to take military action against Syria.

 chart 2

The data is largely consistent among voters age 18-34, 35-49, and 50-64, with about one-third saying the President has made a convincing case and one-half saying he has not. However, the numbers are even more ominous for the President among seniors, with only a quarter (24{09f965da52dc6ab4c1643a77bd40d1f729d807040cd8db540234bb981a782222}) saying he has made the case, compared to a significant majority (61{09f965da52dc6ab4c1643a77bd40d1f729d807040cd8db540234bb981a782222}) who say he has not.

Perhaps most troubling for the President and his administration is the consistency of opposition to taking military action in Syria, and the data by age is a clear demonstration of this daunting problem.

 

Similar Articles

  • Impeachment Fever Has Hit House Democrats
    read more

  • Public Opinion Strategies Congratulates Karen Handel on Winning GA-06
    read more

  • The Democrats’ Pivot
    read more

  • ARE AMERICANS “OVER” PRESIDENT OBAMA?
    read more

  • POS IN THE NEWS – DECEMBER 13, 2013
    read more

Public Opinion Strategies helped us to clarify what we wanted to learn and then conducted research and analysis that shed light even beyond the questions we set out to ask. They were very receptive to our suggestions, responsive to our queries, and flexible when we needed them to be.

Public Opinion Strategies has consistently offered unparalleled advice and spot-on polling that has shaped how and where we spent money and deploy key resources. Additionally, they have always been an excellent steward of limited campaign resources, ensuring we spend wisely and not a dollar more than necessary in order to get the information we need.

Robert Blizzard and Public Opinion Strategies did a great job for us throughout our successful campaign for Congress. Robert gave us accurate data, spot on analysis, and professional advice, all of which were essential to our victory.

Public Opinion Strategies is one of our go-to pollsters when it comes to testing public support for bond ballot measures and other initiative proposals. They are available to provide ongoing consultation with regard to crafting of ballot questions, public outreach messaging, and related efforts.

ACLI has worked with Public Opinion Strategies for decades, through several tough industry battles—often ones in which public opinion does not naturally fall on the side of insurers. Yet Bill and his team consistently provide invaluable strategic advice by refining our messages and helping us frame our issues in a way that makes them understandable and persuasive.

The data from Public Opinion Strategies provided important insight and informed our public awareness campaign. We sincerely appreciate their professionalism and expertise in this arena.

Nicole McCleskey and the team at Public Opinion Strategies have been invaluable to me, both during my campaigns and as Governor of the State of New Mexico. It’s not just the accuracy of their numbers, but guiding the overall strategy that makes them so valuable.

Public Opinion Strategies has been a part of our team in Missouri for more than a decade. With their data and guidance, Republicans here were able to attain a majority in the House in 2002 for the first time in fifty years, and we have been able to grow that majority to the point that we now have a record, veto-proof majority.

In my tenure at two leading business associations, facing huge and complex consumer issues, I have benefitted enormously from the objective advisory skills of Bill and his team. They do their homework, they are rigorous, dispassionate and thoughtful. Turning questions into answers is a clever tag, but it’s also an apt description of the professional talents of the firm.

I consider Public Opinion Strategies to be a part of our team. That is the way we have always worked. They have helped us to understand our needs and fashioned research solutions to meet those needs. They have helped us to meet killer deadlines by being flexible, executing rapidly, and insuring quality. Teamwork is the best way to describe it.

Accuracy, speed, and deep knowledge of key issues and public sentiment are the hallmarks of quality opinion research, and on these measures Public Opinion Strategies consistently delivers. I have had the pleasure of working with Public Opinion Strategies for more than 15 years on dozens of issues, and they are undoubtedly the gold standard.

Public Opinion Strategies’ track record of success and wealth of experience in political campaigns and issue advocacy are why they are one of the most trusted and well respected public opinion firms in Washington, D.C. Their insights and perspectives have helped to inform a wide array of public affairs activities across multiple industries.