Three Ways Millennial Runners Break the Generation’s Stereotype

Three ways millennial runners break the generation’s stereotype

Today, 42 million Americans are considered either a runner or jogger, and about 43% of them are millennials (born between 1980-2000.)[i] While, nationally, the generation only makes up about 25% of the population, millennials have an oversized impact on the running community.[ii]

For a generation considered to have high rates of anxiety, stress, and obesity, some millennials find exercise an antidote for these problems. In an era of $35 SoulCycle rides and its similarly priced boutique fitness competitors dominating the market, running provides an easily accessible, cheaper alternative. It is no surprise that road races have seen large increases in popularity in recent years.

Running USA and RacePartner sponsored a study to examine the trend, conducted by Achieve between October 9-31, 2015, which surveyed 15,631 individuals born between 1980 and 2000 who have completed a race. Their results show that as running continues to attract millennials, this subgroup is defying the generation’s stereotype.

  1. Millennials want to commit to a race in advance.

Millennials are criticized for their flakiness, but this research shows that they like to pick challenging distances to run, sign up in advance, and complete training plans. Half marathons are the most popular distance with 82% of millennials who race wanting to run one in the coming year and 65% have run one in the past year. Fun runs, like the Color Run or Zombie Run, garner attention but only 46% want to participate in the coming year. Instead, it is the longer, less flashy 13.1 mile distance that they choose.

Running a race is not a spontaneous decision for these millennials; instead they register months in advance and train for the distance. Nearly half (48%) of millennials who race like to register 3 months or more in advance, and 41% prefer more than a month. While the largest group (48%) has been running 1-5 years, 76% report running throughout the year even when not training for a specific race.

  1. Social media doesn’t drive their running.

Although millennials who race report finding out about running events through social media (64% describe learning about them that way), improved health and fitness is clearly the top motivator (according to 65%). When asked about elements that impact a runner’s decision to participate in a race, event-generated social media feeds came in third to last, with only event sponsors and age group awards ranking lower.

Instead, the top factors driving millennial runners’ participation are distance, cost, timed events (as opposed to fun runs), and instant results as one finishes the event. They are not interested in paying for either in-person or online training groups associated with a particular event. 83% said they wouldn’t pay for virtual or digital training groups associated with a particular race and 70% said they wouldn’t pay for an in-person running group.

  1. They don’t expect races to be easy, and they choose the bigger challenges.

Millennial runners want to be challenged by their races, pushing themselves to complete the course. Roughly two-thirds (65%) said they run to maintain or improve their health and fitness, in contrast only 18% say they vigorously train in an attempt to always run their best time. The majority of millennial runners are participating because they like the challenge that running and races present, but aren’t driven by the final results. They are most attracted to events that are well known and timed, and are interested in the experience more than costly additions.

Ultramarathons and endurance challenges, like the Spartan Race and North Face Endurance Challenge, have also seen growth in recent years, largely driven by millennials chasing the next big race and becoming bored with only 26.2 miles of a marathon. While only 3% of millennials who race completed an ultramarathon in the last year, 8% want to in the next year.

 

[i] http://www.runningusa.org/2014-running-industry-report?returnTo=annual-reports

[ii] https://www.census.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2015/cb15-113.html

Similar Articles

  • Independents Key to Trump Approval Boost
    read more

  • Looking at ideology by party over the last thirty years
    read more

  • In NBC/WSJ Data, President Trump Has Solid Standing in Key Trump Counties
    read more

  • Record 2018 turnout is powered by an “easy” voting experience
    read more

  • A Year-to-Year Look At President Trump’s Approval Rating
    read more

Public Opinion Strategies helped us to clarify what we wanted to learn and then conducted research and analysis that shed light even beyond the questions we set out to ask. They were very receptive to our suggestions, responsive to our queries, and flexible when we needed them to be.

Public Opinion Strategies has consistently offered unparalleled advice and spot-on polling that has shaped how and where we spent money and deploy key resources. Additionally, they have always been an excellent steward of limited campaign resources, ensuring we spend wisely and not a dollar more than necessary in order to get the information we need.

Robert Blizzard and Public Opinion Strategies did a great job for us throughout our successful campaign for Congress. Robert gave us accurate data, spot on analysis, and professional advice, all of which were essential to our victory.

Public Opinion Strategies is one of our go-to pollsters when it comes to testing public support for bond ballot measures and other initiative proposals. They are available to provide ongoing consultation with regard to crafting of ballot questions, public outreach messaging, and related efforts.

ACLI has worked with Public Opinion Strategies for decades, through several tough industry battles—often ones in which public opinion does not naturally fall on the side of insurers. Yet Bill and his team consistently provide invaluable strategic advice by refining our messages and helping us frame our issues in a way that makes them understandable and persuasive.

The data from Public Opinion Strategies provided important insight and informed our public awareness campaign. We sincerely appreciate their professionalism and expertise in this arena.

Nicole McCleskey and the team at Public Opinion Strategies have been invaluable to me, both during my campaigns and as Governor of the State of New Mexico. It’s not just the accuracy of their numbers, but guiding the overall strategy that makes them so valuable.

Public Opinion Strategies has been a part of our team in Missouri for more than a decade. With their data and guidance, Republicans here were able to attain a majority in the House in 2002 for the first time in fifty years, and we have been able to grow that majority to the point that we now have a record, veto-proof majority.

In my tenure at two leading business associations, facing huge and complex consumer issues, I have benefitted enormously from the objective advisory skills of Bill and his team. They do their homework, they are rigorous, dispassionate and thoughtful. Turning questions into answers is a clever tag, but it’s also an apt description of the professional talents of the firm.

I consider Public Opinion Strategies to be a part of our team. That is the way we have always worked. They have helped us to understand our needs and fashioned research solutions to meet those needs. They have helped us to meet killer deadlines by being flexible, executing rapidly, and insuring quality. Teamwork is the best way to describe it.

Accuracy, speed, and deep knowledge of key issues and public sentiment are the hallmarks of quality opinion research, and on these measures Public Opinion Strategies consistently delivers. I have had the pleasure of working with Public Opinion Strategies for more than 15 years on dozens of issues, and they are undoubtedly the gold standard.

Public Opinion Strategies’ track record of success and wealth of experience in political campaigns and issue advocacy are why they are one of the most trusted and well respected public opinion firms in Washington, D.C. Their insights and perspectives have helped to inform a wide array of public affairs activities across multiple industries.