Three of the Missing Storylines from Iowa and New Hampshire

There are just some basic things that have really struck me that do not seem to be getting a lot of attention.   The tables below talk about turnout and have an observation about 18 to 29 year old voters.

  1. Wow: The turn-out story so far in IA and NH, is a major developing story.

table 1 table 2 table 3

The 2008 campaign saw an enormous surge in Democratic turn-out that dwarfed Republican turn-out and spoke to an intensity gap that cycle.

A few things:

  1. Please note the Republican turn-out is swamping Democratic turn-out so far, with Democrats down in both states compared to 2008.
  2. Bernie Sanders is no Barack Obama in terms of changing the composition of the electorate.

I toggle back and forth between the coverage and while high turn-out is mentioned, not yet with the specificity of what it means by political party – and, if it continues through the primary as it did for the Democrats in 2008, what it might portend about where the intensity might be this cycle.

  1. All millennial voters are not racing to be Socialists!

While it is really impressive to watch the margin by which Sanders is whomping Clinton among 18-29 year olds, trying to generalize about some massive surge in millennial voters moving left politically is wildly overstated.  Guess what … there are thousands of people 18 to 29 years old who went to caucus in Iowa or vote In New Hampshire for BOTH parties.  Given the overall turn-out of the two parties, estimating the turn-out by age would suggest, yes, Democrats have an edge on total turn-out among 18-29 year olds (by 13,453 people).   In percentage terms though, it means of all the 18 to 29 year olds to participate so far, the divide is 55{09f965da52dc6ab4c1643a77bd40d1f729d807040cd8db540234bb981a782222} Democrat to 45{09f965da52dc6ab4c1643a77bd40d1f729d807040cd8db540234bb981a782222} Republican.  That’s not a margin that makes me want to say that an entire generation is moving to the Socialist cause!

 

table 4*17 year old Iowans can caucus

  1. To be the nominee, you actually have to carry your own party.

Clinton broke even in Iowa, while winning caucus goers who described themselves as Democrats by 17 points (56{09f965da52dc6ab4c1643a77bd40d1f729d807040cd8db540234bb981a782222} Clinton/39{09f965da52dc6ab4c1643a77bd40d1f729d807040cd8db540234bb981a782222} Sanders).  In New Hampshire, she lost by 20{09f965da52dc6ab4c1643a77bd40d1f729d807040cd8db540234bb981a782222}+ points, while only narrowly losing among Democrats.

I had the good fortune to work for John McCain in 2000 when he won New Hampshire by 18 points, while losing among Republicans.  That did not end well.

When African American and Latino Democrats start voting and the percentage of Independents begins to fall, Secretary Clinton should be able to right the ship.

In South Carolina, if half the vote is African American and Clinton wins by 40 points, she’s up by 20 points.   Sanders cannot win white voters in South Carolina by 40 points to compensate.  Similar, if a little less dramatic, math applies in every state when non-whites start comprising the roughly 35{09f965da52dc6ab4c1643a77bd40d1f729d807040cd8db540234bb981a782222}+ of the Democratic primary turn-out they comprised in 2008.

Unless Senator Sanders demonstrates a capacity to seriously compete in the African American and Latino communities, it is very difficult to see how he wins the nomination by a coalition of voters under 30, very liberal voters, and Independents.

Similar Articles

  • How the Economic Experience Shapes Politics
    read more

  • Public Opinion Strategies Polls in 18 Successful 2019 Elections
    read more

  • National Survey: Health Insurance Costs Top Health Care Concerns for Voters
    read more

  • Public Release of Research: Strengthening HCAHPS Patient Experience Surveying
    read more

  • Republicans and the 2020 Election
    read more

Public Opinion Strategies helped us to clarify what we wanted to learn and then conducted research and analysis that shed light even beyond the questions we set out to ask. They were very receptive to our suggestions, responsive to our queries, and flexible when we needed them to be.

Public Opinion Strategies has consistently offered unparalleled advice and spot-on polling that has shaped how and where we spent money and deploy key resources. Additionally, they have always been an excellent steward of limited campaign resources, ensuring we spend wisely and not a dollar more than necessary in order to get the information we need.

Robert Blizzard and Public Opinion Strategies did a great job for us throughout our successful campaign for Congress. Robert gave us accurate data, spot on analysis, and professional advice, all of which were essential to our victory.

Public Opinion Strategies is one of our go-to pollsters when it comes to testing public support for bond ballot measures and other initiative proposals. They are available to provide ongoing consultation with regard to crafting of ballot questions, public outreach messaging, and related efforts.

ACLI has worked with Public Opinion Strategies for decades, through several tough industry battles—often ones in which public opinion does not naturally fall on the side of insurers. Yet Bill and his team consistently provide invaluable strategic advice by refining our messages and helping us frame our issues in a way that makes them understandable and persuasive.

The data from Public Opinion Strategies provided important insight and informed our public awareness campaign. We sincerely appreciate their professionalism and expertise in this arena.

Nicole McCleskey and the team at Public Opinion Strategies have been invaluable to me, both during my campaigns and as Governor of the State of New Mexico. It’s not just the accuracy of their numbers, but guiding the overall strategy that makes them so valuable.

Public Opinion Strategies has been a part of our team in Missouri for more than a decade. With their data and guidance, Republicans here were able to attain a majority in the House in 2002 for the first time in fifty years, and we have been able to grow that majority to the point that we now have a record, veto-proof majority.

In my tenure at two leading business associations, facing huge and complex consumer issues, I have benefitted enormously from the objective advisory skills of Bill and his team. They do their homework, they are rigorous, dispassionate and thoughtful. Turning questions into answers is a clever tag, but it’s also an apt description of the professional talents of the firm.

I consider Public Opinion Strategies to be a part of our team. That is the way we have always worked. They have helped us to understand our needs and fashioned research solutions to meet those needs. They have helped us to meet killer deadlines by being flexible, executing rapidly, and insuring quality. Teamwork is the best way to describe it.

Accuracy, speed, and deep knowledge of key issues and public sentiment are the hallmarks of quality opinion research, and on these measures Public Opinion Strategies consistently delivers. I have had the pleasure of working with Public Opinion Strategies for more than 15 years on dozens of issues, and they are undoubtedly the gold standard.

Public Opinion Strategies’ track record of success and wealth of experience in political campaigns and issue advocacy are why they are one of the most trusted and well respected public opinion firms in Washington, D.C. Their insights and perspectives have helped to inform a wide array of public affairs activities across multiple industries.

Social Media Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com