There’s a Reason the Dems are Blaming Bush

Because it is the only message they have.   That doesn’t mean it will move voters.  But, blaming former President George W. Bush is one of the few areas where voters still give President Obama the benefit of the doubt, so Democrats will work with what they have. 

The problem Dems have is that Republicans are increasingly being seen as better for the economy than Dems.  Karl Rove pointed out in the Wall Street Journal:

In its poll released in July, Benenson asked, “Generally speaking, who is more responsible for the recent economic recession—President Barack Obama or President George W. Bush?” The answer was Mr. Bush 53{09f965da52dc6ab4c1643a77bd40d1f729d807040cd8db540234bb981a782222}, Mr. Obama 26{09f965da52dc6ab4c1643a77bd40d1f729d807040cd8db540234bb981a782222}, and “Don’t know” 21{09f965da52dc6ab4c1643a77bd40d1f729d807040cd8db540234bb981a782222}.

But answers to important issues like who’s responsible for the recession are rarely binary. Buried in the “Third Way” data was a different answer that went unmentioned in its covering memo. The question of who’s responsible for the recession was asked a second way, with more possible culprits.

Here the biggest blame for the recession went to “big banks and Wall Street” (34{09f965da52dc6ab4c1643a77bd40d1f729d807040cd8db540234bb981a782222}), followed by “American consumers who lived beyond their means” (24{09f965da52dc6ab4c1643a77bd40d1f729d807040cd8db540234bb981a782222}). Thirteen percent blamed Mr. Obama, 20{09f965da52dc6ab4c1643a77bd40d1f729d807040cd8db540234bb981a782222} blamed Mr. Bush, and 9{09f965da52dc6ab4c1643a77bd40d1f729d807040cd8db540234bb981a782222} were still in the “don’t know category.” Put another way, at least 80{09f965da52dc6ab4c1643a77bd40d1f729d807040cd8db540234bb981a782222} didn’t blame Mr. Bush, as Mr. Obama obsessively does.

My recent Battleground Senate survey for American Crossroads found similar results to the first question by “Third Way” referenced by Rove (who is a supporter of American Crossroads). 

We split sampled two questions about the economy, underscoring that the messaging on the economy is crucial to the perspective voters take. The first question was:

President Obama’s economic policies have run up a record federal deficit while failing to end the recession or slow the record pace of job losses. 53{09f965da52dc6ab4c1643a77bd40d1f729d807040cd8db540234bb981a782222}

…or…

President Obama’s economic policies helped avert an even worse crisis, and are laying the foundation for our eventual economic recovery. 43{09f965da52dc6ab4c1643a77bd40d1f729d807040cd8db540234bb981a782222}

The second question was:

President Obama is more responsible for the problems with the economy. 33{09f965da52dc6ab4c1643a77bd40d1f729d807040cd8db540234bb981a782222}

…or…

Former President Bush is more responsible for the problems with the economy. 52{09f965da52dc6ab4c1643a77bd40d1f729d807040cd8db540234bb981a782222}

Thus, Democrats will want the fight to focus on former President Bush, while Republicans will want the campaign message about the economy to focus on the impact and result of President Obama’s policies.  Republicans need to focus on the current, not the past.

Similar Articles

  • Looking at ideology by party over the last thirty years
    read more

  • In NBC/WSJ Data, President Trump Has Solid Standing in Key Trump Counties
    read more

  • Record 2018 turnout is powered by an “easy” voting experience
    read more

  • A Year-to-Year Look At President Trump’s Approval Rating
    read more

  • Following the 2018 election, 60% of Democrat voters say U.S. political and economic systems are stacked against people like them
    read more

Public Opinion Strategies helped us to clarify what we wanted to learn and then conducted research and analysis that shed light even beyond the questions we set out to ask. They were very receptive to our suggestions, responsive to our queries, and flexible when we needed them to be.

Public Opinion Strategies has consistently offered unparalleled advice and spot-on polling that has shaped how and where we spent money and deploy key resources. Additionally, they have always been an excellent steward of limited campaign resources, ensuring we spend wisely and not a dollar more than necessary in order to get the information we need.

Robert Blizzard and Public Opinion Strategies did a great job for us throughout our successful campaign for Congress. Robert gave us accurate data, spot on analysis, and professional advice, all of which were essential to our victory.

Public Opinion Strategies is one of our go-to pollsters when it comes to testing public support for bond ballot measures and other initiative proposals. They are available to provide ongoing consultation with regard to crafting of ballot questions, public outreach messaging, and related efforts.

ACLI has worked with Public Opinion Strategies for decades, through several tough industry battles—often ones in which public opinion does not naturally fall on the side of insurers. Yet Bill and his team consistently provide invaluable strategic advice by refining our messages and helping us frame our issues in a way that makes them understandable and persuasive.

The data from Public Opinion Strategies provided important insight and informed our public awareness campaign. We sincerely appreciate their professionalism and expertise in this arena.

Nicole McCleskey and the team at Public Opinion Strategies have been invaluable to me, both during my campaigns and as Governor of the State of New Mexico. It’s not just the accuracy of their numbers, but guiding the overall strategy that makes them so valuable.

Public Opinion Strategies has been a part of our team in Missouri for more than a decade. With their data and guidance, Republicans here were able to attain a majority in the House in 2002 for the first time in fifty years, and we have been able to grow that majority to the point that we now have a record, veto-proof majority.

Lori Weigel from Public Opinion Strategies reviewed our needs and guided us toward asking the right questions. Her reporting was easy to follow and her interpretation of the data provided clear decision points.

In my tenure at two leading business associations, facing huge and complex consumer issues, I have benefitted enormously from the objective advisory skills of Bill and his team. They do their homework, they are rigorous, dispassionate and thoughtful. Turning questions into answers is a clever tag, but it’s also an apt description of the professional talents of the firm.

I consider Public Opinion Strategies to be a part of our team. That is the way we have always worked. They have helped us to understand our needs and fashioned research solutions to meet those needs. They have helped us to meet killer deadlines by being flexible, executing rapidly, and insuring quality. Teamwork is the best way to describe it.

Accuracy, speed, and deep knowledge of key issues and public sentiment are the hallmarks of quality opinion research, and on these measures Public Opinion Strategies consistently delivers. I have had the pleasure of working with Public Opinion Strategies for more than 15 years on dozens of issues, and they are undoubtedly the gold standard.

Public Opinion Strategies’ track record of success and wealth of experience in political campaigns and issue advocacy are why they are one of the most trusted and well respected public opinion firms in Washington, D.C. Their insights and perspectives have helped to inform a wide array of public affairs activities across multiple industries.