The Weaknesses of the Democratic Narrative for 2010

The Democrats say they have settled on their message arc for the cycle, and it is clearly a bifurcated approach. Nationally, President Obama, the White House, and their water-carrying special interests are going to frame the election as a choice, not a referendum. In specific campaigns, Democratic candidates are going to run as a combination of Tip O’Neill (“all politics is local”) and Mr. Smith (“Washington? Never heard of it.” – to be honest, I just made that line up, but that IS the gist of their message).

Typically, on this blog, I tend to write about public opinion trends, or specific issues, and the impact on campaigns. Instead, in this posting, I’m going to deconstruct both Democratic messages – both the meta national message, and the local trumps national message. If you are a Democrat (after all, this blog is open to reading by all), you may want to stop reading, because you’ll be depressed.

Nationally, the Democrats say that voters will have a choice keeping the party that is making the hard decisions in driver’s seat (although spending other people’s money, or the money of future generations is always easier than not spending money) or giving the keys back to the party that acted like teenage boys who drank whiskey and drove the country into the ditch. “These folks drove the economy into a ditch, and they want the keys back,” Obama amused himself by saying at a Missouri fundraiser, “And you’ve got to say the same thing to them that you say to your teenager: You can’t take the keys back, because you don’t know how to drive yet.”

While there are a myriad of problems with Obama’s approach (which doesn’t exactly fit with his promise to transcend “politics as usual,” but for him that’s just politics as, um, usual), five are particularly telling as to why that won’t work:

As Reid Wilson pointed out in National Journal’s Hotline On Call, Obama has trotted out this message already and it failed – it failed in New Jersey, Virginia, and Massachusetts. And, the President’s approval rating was higher at the time than it is now.

Obama’s message (for simplicity’s sake, let’s call it the “whiskey and car keys” attack) has echoes of the “Stay the Course” message of the 1982 Republican campaign (which to their credit the Democrats humorously parodied as “stay the curse”) when both the mood of the country and the unemployment rate were similar to what it is now. Republicans lost nearly 14% of the seats they held in the House – a similar loss for the Dems would knock them down to 220 seats, a number that would make the House ungovernable for the Dems.

And, that’s a best case scenario – the Democrats hold many seats by a tenuous thread in areas where they won because of the white Independent voter revolt against the second term of the Bush Administration, coupled with GOP overspending and scandals.

The message against Obama’s leadership on the economy is significantly stronger than the whiskey and car keys message. The well-known NPR of key congressional districts matched up the Dem message of blame the past versus the idea that Obama’s economic policies are hurting the country, and more voters in these key swing seats believe the message that Obama’s policies are making it worse by a net eight points. Plus, the message that the stimulus failed, the bailouts failed, and the health care bill will cost too much money trumps the Democratic message of blaming everything on the past. The past is passe, while the future is now.

The problem with the whiskey and car keys message is that elections ARE referendums. Voters readily decide whether to reward the party IN power (1998, 2002), punish the party in power (1992, 1994, 2006, 2008), or render a split decision (2000, 2004). In 2006, Republicans tried everything the Democrats are talking about now. None of it worked. When the electorate loses confidence in your leadership, your arguments carry little water (no matter how wonderful they sound to you). As the Washington Post poll this week showed, voters want a check and balance to President Obama even more than they want to vote for a Republican for Congress.

And, it’s not just a message problem. The troubled party in power deludes itself into believing that the electorate would love its accomplishments if only the White House were better at driving the message. How many times have you seen some variation of the following: “In 2006/2010 we Republicans/Democrats are having a difficult time getting our message out about national security/health care because the White House is allowing the liberal media/Fox News to control the message.” While it’s temporarily reassuring to believe that the problem is propaganda, not policy, there is not enough lipstick to pretty up a pig once voters believe it is a pig.

But the “whiskey and car keys” approach is just one of the two Democratic message arcs for the cycle. The other one – which is completely contradictory to the former – is to cite the famous Tip O’Neill saying that “all politics is local.” That’s fine and dandy when you represent a safe seat in Massachusetts, but it’s also been proven wrong in any change election.

In 2006, Republicans took two approaches to the “all politics is local” dictum – and, in most cases, neither worked. The first approach was to point out all the wonderful things they had done for the district. Voters said, “that’s nice, but you guys are in charge and the country is going to hell in a handbasket.” Local projects did not count for anything when voters added up their frustration with the national political environment.

The second approach was to relentlessly attack the Democratic candidate using opposition research – a tack that sounds familiar to Democratic plans in many races this cycle (it’s the “they may hate us, but wait till they see the other jerk’s problems” route). But, when voters are angry at one party, they are more than willing to overlook the sins of the challenger. Carefully crafted negative ads gain no traction, and the incumbent from the in-party is left spinning their wheels.

The “all politics is local” line should be modified to something more along the lines of “all politics is local, except when voters want to run a hot poker through an elephant (2006) or a donkey (2010).” While that redone line is not as pithy as Speaker O’Neill’s comment, it is far more accurate.

This is not to fault the Democrats for trying to make themselves feel better. Instead, it is to point out that, based on recent political history, Democrats should not be surprised when they wake up the morning after Election Day and reach for a consolation bottle instead of a champagne bottle.

 

 

 

 

Similar Articles

  • Independents Key to Trump Approval Boost
    read more

  • Looking at ideology by party over the last thirty years
    read more

  • In NBC/WSJ Data, President Trump Has Solid Standing in Key Trump Counties
    read more

  • Record 2018 turnout is powered by an “easy” voting experience
    read more

  • A Year-to-Year Look At President Trump’s Approval Rating
    read more

Public Opinion Strategies helped us to clarify what we wanted to learn and then conducted research and analysis that shed light even beyond the questions we set out to ask. They were very receptive to our suggestions, responsive to our queries, and flexible when we needed them to be.

Public Opinion Strategies has consistently offered unparalleled advice and spot-on polling that has shaped how and where we spent money and deploy key resources. Additionally, they have always been an excellent steward of limited campaign resources, ensuring we spend wisely and not a dollar more than necessary in order to get the information we need.

Robert Blizzard and Public Opinion Strategies did a great job for us throughout our successful campaign for Congress. Robert gave us accurate data, spot on analysis, and professional advice, all of which were essential to our victory.

Public Opinion Strategies is one of our go-to pollsters when it comes to testing public support for bond ballot measures and other initiative proposals. They are available to provide ongoing consultation with regard to crafting of ballot questions, public outreach messaging, and related efforts.

ACLI has worked with Public Opinion Strategies for decades, through several tough industry battles—often ones in which public opinion does not naturally fall on the side of insurers. Yet Bill and his team consistently provide invaluable strategic advice by refining our messages and helping us frame our issues in a way that makes them understandable and persuasive.

The data from Public Opinion Strategies provided important insight and informed our public awareness campaign. We sincerely appreciate their professionalism and expertise in this arena.

Nicole McCleskey and the team at Public Opinion Strategies have been invaluable to me, both during my campaigns and as Governor of the State of New Mexico. It’s not just the accuracy of their numbers, but guiding the overall strategy that makes them so valuable.

Public Opinion Strategies has been a part of our team in Missouri for more than a decade. With their data and guidance, Republicans here were able to attain a majority in the House in 2002 for the first time in fifty years, and we have been able to grow that majority to the point that we now have a record, veto-proof majority.

In my tenure at two leading business associations, facing huge and complex consumer issues, I have benefitted enormously from the objective advisory skills of Bill and his team. They do their homework, they are rigorous, dispassionate and thoughtful. Turning questions into answers is a clever tag, but it’s also an apt description of the professional talents of the firm.

I consider Public Opinion Strategies to be a part of our team. That is the way we have always worked. They have helped us to understand our needs and fashioned research solutions to meet those needs. They have helped us to meet killer deadlines by being flexible, executing rapidly, and insuring quality. Teamwork is the best way to describe it.

Accuracy, speed, and deep knowledge of key issues and public sentiment are the hallmarks of quality opinion research, and on these measures Public Opinion Strategies consistently delivers. I have had the pleasure of working with Public Opinion Strategies for more than 15 years on dozens of issues, and they are undoubtedly the gold standard.

Public Opinion Strategies’ track record of success and wealth of experience in political campaigns and issue advocacy are why they are one of the most trusted and well respected public opinion firms in Washington, D.C. Their insights and perspectives have helped to inform a wide array of public affairs activities across multiple industries.