The Vote In The House Fails to Build Support for Health Care Reform

By Bill McInturff and Elizabeth Harrington

In one of the first national surveys completed after the House vote on health care reform…things do not look good for President Obama and Democrats in Congress:

  • Opposition to President Obama’s health care plan is higher after the House vote than our previous tracks (29{09f965da52dc6ab4c1643a77bd40d1f729d807040cd8db540234bb981a782222} favor/40{09f965da52dc6ab4c1643a77bd40d1f729d807040cd8db540234bb981a782222} oppose). Voters’ net opposition to the plan has increased from -6{09f965da52dc6ab4c1643a77bd40d1f729d807040cd8db540234bb981a782222} in September (31{09f965da52dc6ab4c1643a77bd40d1f729d807040cd8db540234bb981a782222} favor/37{09f965da52dc6ab4c1643a77bd40d1f729d807040cd8db540234bb981a782222} oppose) to -11{09f965da52dc6ab4c1643a77bd40d1f729d807040cd8db540234bb981a782222} today.
  • Voter opposition to President Obama’s health care plan is higher than ever measured for President Clinton’s plan in 1993/1994 (35{09f965da52dc6ab4c1643a77bd40d1f729d807040cd8db540234bb981a782222} oppose in June 1994).
  • Multiple surveys show voters believe President Obama’s health care plan will mean their health care costs will increase (46{09f965da52dc6ab4c1643a77bd40d1f729d807040cd8db540234bb981a782222} increase/11{09f965da52dc6ab4c1643a77bd40d1f729d807040cd8db540234bb981a782222} decrease) and their quality of care will get worse (40{09f965da52dc6ab4c1643a77bd40d1f729d807040cd8db540234bb981a782222} get worse/18{09f965da52dc6ab4c1643a77bd40d1f729d807040cd8db540234bb981a782222} get better). Concerns about cost have trended up since September.
  • Data continue to show the more people hear about President Obama’s health care plan the less they like it (38{09f965da52dc6ab4c1643a77bd40d1f729d807040cd8db540234bb981a782222} the more I like it/52{09f965da52dc6ab4c1643a77bd40d1f729d807040cd8db540234bb981a782222} the less I like it).
  • The tide has significantly changed as Americans’ views about government involvement in health care are shifting. In March 2009, by a one point margin, voters said the federal government had a responsibility to provide government-run health care coverage to all. Today, this number has significantly shifted as voters now say by a 17 point margin it is not the federal government’s responsibility.

liz-chart

This is reinforced by recently released data by Gallup. “More Americans now say it is not the federal government’s responsibility to make sure all Americans have healthcare coverage (50{09f965da52dc6ab4c1643a77bd40d1f729d807040cd8db540234bb981a782222}) than say it is (47{09f965da52dc6ab4c1643a77bd40d1f729d807040cd8db540234bb981a782222}). This is a first since Gallup began tracking this question.” (National survey conducted by Gallup, November 5-8, 2009 among 1,008 adults)

Detailed survey results can be found here.

Similar Articles

  • Looking at ideology by party over the last thirty years
    read more

  • In NBC/WSJ Data, President Trump Has Solid Standing in Key Trump Counties
    read more

  • Record 2018 turnout is powered by an “easy” voting experience
    read more

  • A Year-to-Year Look At President Trump’s Approval Rating
    read more

  • Following the 2018 election, 60% of Democrat voters say U.S. political and economic systems are stacked against people like them
    read more

Public Opinion Strategies helped us to clarify what we wanted to learn and then conducted research and analysis that shed light even beyond the questions we set out to ask. They were very receptive to our suggestions, responsive to our queries, and flexible when we needed them to be.

Public Opinion Strategies has consistently offered unparalleled advice and spot-on polling that has shaped how and where we spent money and deploy key resources. Additionally, they have always been an excellent steward of limited campaign resources, ensuring we spend wisely and not a dollar more than necessary in order to get the information we need.

Robert Blizzard and Public Opinion Strategies did a great job for us throughout our successful campaign for Congress. Robert gave us accurate data, spot on analysis, and professional advice, all of which were essential to our victory.

Public Opinion Strategies is one of our go-to pollsters when it comes to testing public support for bond ballot measures and other initiative proposals. They are available to provide ongoing consultation with regard to crafting of ballot questions, public outreach messaging, and related efforts.

ACLI has worked with Public Opinion Strategies for decades, through several tough industry battles—often ones in which public opinion does not naturally fall on the side of insurers. Yet Bill and his team consistently provide invaluable strategic advice by refining our messages and helping us frame our issues in a way that makes them understandable and persuasive.

The data from Public Opinion Strategies provided important insight and informed our public awareness campaign. We sincerely appreciate their professionalism and expertise in this arena.

Nicole McCleskey and the team at Public Opinion Strategies have been invaluable to me, both during my campaigns and as Governor of the State of New Mexico. It’s not just the accuracy of their numbers, but guiding the overall strategy that makes them so valuable.

Public Opinion Strategies has been a part of our team in Missouri for more than a decade. With their data and guidance, Republicans here were able to attain a majority in the House in 2002 for the first time in fifty years, and we have been able to grow that majority to the point that we now have a record, veto-proof majority.

Lori Weigel from Public Opinion Strategies reviewed our needs and guided us toward asking the right questions. Her reporting was easy to follow and her interpretation of the data provided clear decision points.

In my tenure at two leading business associations, facing huge and complex consumer issues, I have benefitted enormously from the objective advisory skills of Bill and his team. They do their homework, they are rigorous, dispassionate and thoughtful. Turning questions into answers is a clever tag, but it’s also an apt description of the professional talents of the firm.

I consider Public Opinion Strategies to be a part of our team. That is the way we have always worked. They have helped us to understand our needs and fashioned research solutions to meet those needs. They have helped us to meet killer deadlines by being flexible, executing rapidly, and insuring quality. Teamwork is the best way to describe it.

Accuracy, speed, and deep knowledge of key issues and public sentiment are the hallmarks of quality opinion research, and on these measures Public Opinion Strategies consistently delivers. I have had the pleasure of working with Public Opinion Strategies for more than 15 years on dozens of issues, and they are undoubtedly the gold standard.

Public Opinion Strategies’ track record of success and wealth of experience in political campaigns and issue advocacy are why they are one of the most trusted and well respected public opinion firms in Washington, D.C. Their insights and perspectives have helped to inform a wide array of public affairs activities across multiple industries.