The Unemployment Rate and Re-election

In the last 60 years there have been eight incumbent presidents seeking re-election. The table below shows the unemployment rate in January of the first year of their term, and then in January, July, and October of the last year of their first term.

As the White House squabbles over a hundredth of a percent in the latest labor statistics we asked ourselves: Why is this nit worth picking?

Here are just a few facts that help understand what 8.3{09f965da52dc6ab4c1643a77bd40d1f729d807040cd8db540234bb981a782222} unemployment means historically and from the Obama re-election campaign’s point of view:

  1. This administration is in uncharted territory when it comes to unemployment. In the last 60 years, no incumbent has faced unemployment over 8.0{09f965da52dc6ab4c1643a77bd40d1f729d807040cd8db540234bb981a782222} in his re-election year. Only in January 1984 did unemployment hit 8.0{09f965da52dc6ab4c1643a77bd40d1f729d807040cd8db540234bb981a782222}, but the rate steadily dropped throughout that year and Reagan went on to win re-election in a landslide. In all of 2012 however, unemployment has not dipped below that historic high-water mark.
  2. As the table shows, incumbents have been re-elected despite an overall increase in the unemployment rate over their first term. Therefore, when it comes to unemployment, the question is not “are we better off today than we were four years ago.”  Instead the question is, “What have you done for me lately?” with January of the election year being a benchmark for that measure.
  3. Using January of the election year as a benchmark, over the past 60 years there is a consistent trend: Incumbents are defeated when the unemployment rate over the final ten months of their term increases (1980 Jimmy Carter) or remains flat (1992 George H. W. Bush).
  4. In seven of the past eight election years where an incumbent is vying for a second term the unemployment rate has dropped or remained steady between July and October .*  As we can see in the table a drop in the final four months does not correlate with re-election.  But this year is again unlike any other in that the January and July unemployment rates are both 8.3{09f965da52dc6ab4c1643a77bd40d1f729d807040cd8db540234bb981a782222}.  In mid-July Fed Chair Ben Bernanke warned that progress in reducing an 8.2{09f965da52dc6ab4c1643a77bd40d1f729d807040cd8db540234bb981a782222} unemployment rate “seems likely to be frustratingly slow,” now the rate has risen and is effectively flat for 2012.

Bottom line

With the most recent unemployment report, the Obama economy has returned to its January benchmark of 8.3{09f965da52dc6ab4c1643a77bd40d1f729d807040cd8db540234bb981a782222} unemployment. Predictions for the next several months portend a sluggish economy. History suggests that if unemployment stays at 8.3{09f965da52dc6ab4c1643a77bd40d1f729d807040cd8db540234bb981a782222} or increases any more in October – Obama will not be re-elected.

*Only in 1964 did the unemployment rate grow from July to October in an election year with an incumbent running for re-election.

Similar Articles

  • Public Education Update
    read more

  • Americans See China And Russia As Adversaries Posing Two Different Threats
    read more

  • A New Look At Ideology
    read more

  • Is social media your friend or a frenemy?
    read more

  • Trump’s numbers tied for his peak high as impeachment talk looms
    read more

Public Opinion Strategies helped us to clarify what we wanted to learn and then conducted research and analysis that shed light even beyond the questions we set out to ask. They were very receptive to our suggestions, responsive to our queries, and flexible when we needed them to be.

Public Opinion Strategies has consistently offered unparalleled advice and spot-on polling that has shaped how and where we spent money and deploy key resources. Additionally, they have always been an excellent steward of limited campaign resources, ensuring we spend wisely and not a dollar more than necessary in order to get the information we need.

Robert Blizzard and Public Opinion Strategies did a great job for us throughout our successful campaign for Congress. Robert gave us accurate data, spot on analysis, and professional advice, all of which were essential to our victory.

Public Opinion Strategies is one of our go-to pollsters when it comes to testing public support for bond ballot measures and other initiative proposals. They are available to provide ongoing consultation with regard to crafting of ballot questions, public outreach messaging, and related efforts.

ACLI has worked with Public Opinion Strategies for decades, through several tough industry battles—often ones in which public opinion does not naturally fall on the side of insurers. Yet Bill and his team consistently provide invaluable strategic advice by refining our messages and helping us frame our issues in a way that makes them understandable and persuasive.

The data from Public Opinion Strategies provided important insight and informed our public awareness campaign. We sincerely appreciate their professionalism and expertise in this arena.

Nicole McCleskey and the team at Public Opinion Strategies have been invaluable to me, both during my campaigns and as Governor of the State of New Mexico. It’s not just the accuracy of their numbers, but guiding the overall strategy that makes them so valuable.

Public Opinion Strategies has been a part of our team in Missouri for more than a decade. With their data and guidance, Republicans here were able to attain a majority in the House in 2002 for the first time in fifty years, and we have been able to grow that majority to the point that we now have a record, veto-proof majority.

In my tenure at two leading business associations, facing huge and complex consumer issues, I have benefitted enormously from the objective advisory skills of Bill and his team. They do their homework, they are rigorous, dispassionate and thoughtful. Turning questions into answers is a clever tag, but it’s also an apt description of the professional talents of the firm.

I consider Public Opinion Strategies to be a part of our team. That is the way we have always worked. They have helped us to understand our needs and fashioned research solutions to meet those needs. They have helped us to meet killer deadlines by being flexible, executing rapidly, and insuring quality. Teamwork is the best way to describe it.

Accuracy, speed, and deep knowledge of key issues and public sentiment are the hallmarks of quality opinion research, and on these measures Public Opinion Strategies consistently delivers. I have had the pleasure of working with Public Opinion Strategies for more than 15 years on dozens of issues, and they are undoubtedly the gold standard.

Public Opinion Strategies’ track record of success and wealth of experience in political campaigns and issue advocacy are why they are one of the most trusted and well respected public opinion firms in Washington, D.C. Their insights and perspectives have helped to inform a wide array of public affairs activities across multiple industries.

Social Media Auto Publish Powered By :