The September 11th Trials: Yet another bad idea from the Obama Administration.

As the heath care debate has consumed much of the news coverage and political chit-chat over the last few weeks, focus on an important decision from President Obama’s Administration has been left hovering on the back burner. That’s the decision to try the suspected terrorists of the September 11 attacks in U.S. civilian court.

It was no coincidence the White House chose to release this jaw-dropping news on a Friday in the hope it would get buried going into the weekend. And, there’s no doubt it has been a deliberate tactic to consistently frame this political hot potato as U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder’s decision for , rather than President Obama or his Administration’s decision…because voters don’t like it.

This month’s CBS/NY Times poll* shows that a majority of voters (54{09f965da52dc6ab4c1643a77bd40d1f729d807040cd8db540234bb981a782222}) think the suspects should be tried in a closed military court while 40{09f965da52dc6ab4c1643a77bd40d1f729d807040cd8db540234bb981a782222} say they should be tried in an open criminal court. The latest Fox News/Opinion Dynamics poll** offers similar results – 52{09f965da52dc6ab4c1643a77bd40d1f729d807040cd8db540234bb981a782222} say the five detainees accused of conspiring to commit the September 11 terrorist attacks should be tried in a military tribunal rather than in the U.S. Court system (40{09f965da52dc6ab4c1643a77bd40d1f729d807040cd8db540234bb981a782222}); and almost half (49{09f965da52dc6ab4c1643a77bd40d1f729d807040cd8db540234bb981a782222}) say Holder’s decision is a bad idea (42{09f965da52dc6ab4c1643a77bd40d1f729d807040cd8db540234bb981a782222} say it is a good idea).

Democrats stand alone in what can only be described as partisan support for a trial in the U.S. court system (55{09f965da52dc6ab4c1643a77bd40d1f729d807040cd8db540234bb981a782222}) while very solid majorities of Independents (60{09f965da52dc6ab4c1643a77bd40d1f729d807040cd8db540234bb981a782222}) and Republicans (64{09f965da52dc6ab4c1643a77bd40d1f729d807040cd8db540234bb981a782222}) call for a military tribunal.

Liberal Democrat defenders of Eric Holder’s decision say this is an opportunity for us to show off to the world the greatness of our democratic judicial system. Um, ok, but at what cost? One wonders if the Administration and supporters of the decision have really thought this one through.

First of all, a whopping 78{09f965da52dc6ab4c1643a77bd40d1f729d807040cd8db540234bb981a782222} agree (including 70{09f965da52dc6ab4c1643a77bd40d1f729d807040cd8db540234bb981a782222} of Democrats) the September 11 attacks were an act of terrorism, not a violent crime (6{09f965da52dc6ab4c1643a77bd40d1f729d807040cd8db540234bb981a782222}). There is no mystery to this: the people on trial are terrorists and they are foreigners; so why we would give them the rights afforded to Americans and treat them like criminals in an open civilian trial makes absolutely no sense. Perhaps more importantly though, these suspects had already agreed to a military tribunal, and when more consideration is given to the potential outcomes of having an open criminal trial voters – even Democrats – are rightly concerned.


Finally, keep in mind these polls were taken before this weekend’s report that the five suspects plan to now plead not-guilty so they can express their political and religious views during trial(!)

Is that really what Mr. Obama, Mr. Holder and their Democrat followers want for our country? That we have to endure the extremist rants of terrorists and re-live the national nightmare of September 11th – all in the name of trying to impress other countries? These initial voter reactions may only be the tip of the iceberg on this issue and this Administration could find itself sinking even further with voters as the whole things plays out.

*CBS/NY Times National Poll conducted November 13-16, 2009 among 1,167 adults.
**Fox News/Opinion Dynamics National Poll conducted November 17-18, 2009 among 900 registered voters.



Similar Articles

  • Public Education Update
    read more

  • Americans See China And Russia As Adversaries Posing Two Different Threats
    read more

  • A New Look At Ideology
    read more

  • Is social media your friend or a frenemy?
    read more

  • Trump’s numbers tied for his peak high as impeachment talk looms
    read more

Public Opinion Strategies helped us to clarify what we wanted to learn and then conducted research and analysis that shed light even beyond the questions we set out to ask. They were very receptive to our suggestions, responsive to our queries, and flexible when we needed them to be.

Public Opinion Strategies has consistently offered unparalleled advice and spot-on polling that has shaped how and where we spent money and deploy key resources. Additionally, they have always been an excellent steward of limited campaign resources, ensuring we spend wisely and not a dollar more than necessary in order to get the information we need.

Robert Blizzard and Public Opinion Strategies did a great job for us throughout our successful campaign for Congress. Robert gave us accurate data, spot on analysis, and professional advice, all of which were essential to our victory.

Public Opinion Strategies is one of our go-to pollsters when it comes to testing public support for bond ballot measures and other initiative proposals. They are available to provide ongoing consultation with regard to crafting of ballot questions, public outreach messaging, and related efforts.

ACLI has worked with Public Opinion Strategies for decades, through several tough industry battles—often ones in which public opinion does not naturally fall on the side of insurers. Yet Bill and his team consistently provide invaluable strategic advice by refining our messages and helping us frame our issues in a way that makes them understandable and persuasive.

The data from Public Opinion Strategies provided important insight and informed our public awareness campaign. We sincerely appreciate their professionalism and expertise in this arena.

Nicole McCleskey and the team at Public Opinion Strategies have been invaluable to me, both during my campaigns and as Governor of the State of New Mexico. It’s not just the accuracy of their numbers, but guiding the overall strategy that makes them so valuable.

Public Opinion Strategies has been a part of our team in Missouri for more than a decade. With their data and guidance, Republicans here were able to attain a majority in the House in 2002 for the first time in fifty years, and we have been able to grow that majority to the point that we now have a record, veto-proof majority.

In my tenure at two leading business associations, facing huge and complex consumer issues, I have benefitted enormously from the objective advisory skills of Bill and his team. They do their homework, they are rigorous, dispassionate and thoughtful. Turning questions into answers is a clever tag, but it’s also an apt description of the professional talents of the firm.

I consider Public Opinion Strategies to be a part of our team. That is the way we have always worked. They have helped us to understand our needs and fashioned research solutions to meet those needs. They have helped us to meet killer deadlines by being flexible, executing rapidly, and insuring quality. Teamwork is the best way to describe it.

Accuracy, speed, and deep knowledge of key issues and public sentiment are the hallmarks of quality opinion research, and on these measures Public Opinion Strategies consistently delivers. I have had the pleasure of working with Public Opinion Strategies for more than 15 years on dozens of issues, and they are undoubtedly the gold standard.

Public Opinion Strategies’ track record of success and wealth of experience in political campaigns and issue advocacy are why they are one of the most trusted and well respected public opinion firms in Washington, D.C. Their insights and perspectives have helped to inform a wide array of public affairs activities across multiple industries.

Social Media Auto Publish Powered By :