The Health Care Debate: Witness The “NIMBY” Effect In Action

This article was co-authored by Bill McInturff and Alex Bratty.

If you’ve been following the ins-and-outs of the health care debate and reading some of the recent articles regarding public attitudes towards the proposal for a public plan you might be a little confused about what it is people really want. And rightly so, for there are many numbers floating around out there and some fail to capture the complexity of the issue.

In our recent NBC/WSJ poll* we asked a series of questions on the issue of health care, specifically designed to cover the various angles of the debate.

Sure, when asked the importance of having the choice of both a public plan and a private plan for their health insurance three-quarters (76%) of Americans say this is “extremely” or “quite important.” But, pause for a moment and ask yourself this question: Is this a surprising answer for a country that prides itself on wanting more choices? Of course not. Whether it’s health care or some other issue, in general, Americans favor choice every time.

The point is you have to dig a little deeper to find out what people worry about. As with many public policy issues, the rub comes when people feel it might personally impact them in an adverse way – yes, that familiar “Not-In-My-Backyard” or “NIMBY” effect.

First, consider the concern among Americans who already have private health insurance (59% of our survey respondents). Asked if a public plan administered by the federal government was created and available to all Americans, how likely they think it is their employer would drop their current health coverage, almost half (47%) of these privately insured adults said they thought it would be “very” or “somewhat” likely. (32% think it is “not too” or “not at all” likely.)

Next, consider the concern about how we’re going to pay for the trillion dollar health plan Obama is proposing. Not surprisingly, a majority can live with the options that don’t seem to directly affect them: Requiring everyone to have health insurance – those who can afford it buy their own, those who can’t get government assistance (62% acceptable); raising taxes on people who earn more than $250,000 per year (62% acceptable).

The margins get smaller at the thought of requiring all small businesses to offer coverage or pay a percentage of their payroll to the government (55% acceptable, 37% unacceptable); and things get shaky at the suggestion of reducing Medicare and Medicaid reimbursements to doctors (47% acceptable, 46% unacceptable). But, the rubber really hits the road when Americans see a potential direct impact. The idea of requiring people to pay taxes on their benefits is roundly rejected, whether those taxes are on a portion of only the most generous plans (59% unacceptable) or for everyone to pay on all private plans (70% unacceptable).

So you see, while Obama’s proposed plan has initial support (55%), once we get into the details and how it might personally impact people – especially the majority who currently have private health insurance – the picture changes dramatically. Americans become less certain about their options if it could mean potentially losing their existing coverage, or taxing their benefits.

*National survey of 1,008 adults conducted June 12-15, 2009
(Public Opinion Strategies partners with Peter D. Hart Research Associates to conduct the NBC/WSJ polls. Neither Peter D. Hart Research Associates nor NBC/WSJ are responsible for these conclusions.)

Similar Articles

  • Public Education Update
    read more

  • Americans See China And Russia As Adversaries Posing Two Different Threats
    read more

  • A New Look At Ideology
    read more

  • Is social media your friend or a frenemy?
    read more

  • Trump’s numbers tied for his peak high as impeachment talk looms
    read more

Public Opinion Strategies helped us to clarify what we wanted to learn and then conducted research and analysis that shed light even beyond the questions we set out to ask. They were very receptive to our suggestions, responsive to our queries, and flexible when we needed them to be.

Public Opinion Strategies has consistently offered unparalleled advice and spot-on polling that has shaped how and where we spent money and deploy key resources. Additionally, they have always been an excellent steward of limited campaign resources, ensuring we spend wisely and not a dollar more than necessary in order to get the information we need.

Robert Blizzard and Public Opinion Strategies did a great job for us throughout our successful campaign for Congress. Robert gave us accurate data, spot on analysis, and professional advice, all of which were essential to our victory.

Public Opinion Strategies is one of our go-to pollsters when it comes to testing public support for bond ballot measures and other initiative proposals. They are available to provide ongoing consultation with regard to crafting of ballot questions, public outreach messaging, and related efforts.

ACLI has worked with Public Opinion Strategies for decades, through several tough industry battles—often ones in which public opinion does not naturally fall on the side of insurers. Yet Bill and his team consistently provide invaluable strategic advice by refining our messages and helping us frame our issues in a way that makes them understandable and persuasive.

The data from Public Opinion Strategies provided important insight and informed our public awareness campaign. We sincerely appreciate their professionalism and expertise in this arena.

Nicole McCleskey and the team at Public Opinion Strategies have been invaluable to me, both during my campaigns and as Governor of the State of New Mexico. It’s not just the accuracy of their numbers, but guiding the overall strategy that makes them so valuable.

Public Opinion Strategies has been a part of our team in Missouri for more than a decade. With their data and guidance, Republicans here were able to attain a majority in the House in 2002 for the first time in fifty years, and we have been able to grow that majority to the point that we now have a record, veto-proof majority.

In my tenure at two leading business associations, facing huge and complex consumer issues, I have benefitted enormously from the objective advisory skills of Bill and his team. They do their homework, they are rigorous, dispassionate and thoughtful. Turning questions into answers is a clever tag, but it’s also an apt description of the professional talents of the firm.

I consider Public Opinion Strategies to be a part of our team. That is the way we have always worked. They have helped us to understand our needs and fashioned research solutions to meet those needs. They have helped us to meet killer deadlines by being flexible, executing rapidly, and insuring quality. Teamwork is the best way to describe it.

Accuracy, speed, and deep knowledge of key issues and public sentiment are the hallmarks of quality opinion research, and on these measures Public Opinion Strategies consistently delivers. I have had the pleasure of working with Public Opinion Strategies for more than 15 years on dozens of issues, and they are undoubtedly the gold standard.

Public Opinion Strategies’ track record of success and wealth of experience in political campaigns and issue advocacy are why they are one of the most trusted and well respected public opinion firms in Washington, D.C. Their insights and perspectives have helped to inform a wide array of public affairs activities across multiple industries.

Social Media Auto Publish Powered By :