The Early Vote in North Carolina

In the run­up to this fall’s midterm elections, much has been written about the ways a mid­term electorate differs from a Presidential electorate.

However, some data put together by Dr. Michael Bitzer, a professor of politics and Provost at Catawba College in North Carolina, suggests that there is not just a significant difference in WHO votes in mid­term and Presidential elections, but also in WHEN people vote in the two types of elections.

Dr. Bitzer looked at the past five general elections in North Carolina (2004­-2012) and calculated what percentage of the votes were EARLY votes and what percentage were ELECTION DAY votes in four different age groups. That data is listed in the table below

2014-07-15_0920
(Note: in the five election years listed, North Carolina had a seventeen day early voting window. Legislation has recently been passed to shorten that window to ten days. The legislation would also change the laws for mail­in absentee votes. That legislation is currently being challenged in court.)

Some key takeaways:

  • In North Carolina, early voting is NOT just for seniors. In both 2008 and 2012, a majority of voters in all four age groups voted early. In 2010, at least one­quarter of voters in all age groups voted early.
  • The 2008 Presidential campaign literally changed the way millions of North Carolinians voted. Twice as many 18­40 year olds voted early in 2008 as compared to 2004, and the increase among voters age 41 and over was close to double as well.
  • In 2012, there was almost NO change in any age group in the percentage of voters who cast their vote early. So, the shift to early voting in 2008 was not just a blip on the radar.
  • In 2010, there was a significant decline from 2008 in the percentage of voters who cast their vote early. That decline was fairly consistent across all four age groups.
  • However, the 2010 early vote percentages did increase from 2006.

Looking ahead to 2014, the data suggests that the early voter percentage would drop off from where it was in 2012 and more closely resemble 2010, but the reduction of the early vote window might potentially mean early percentages that look more like 2006.

Campaigns have long operated under the axiom that the best vote is an early vote, and this data indicates that, at least in North Carolina, voters are shifting that way as well.

Similar Articles

  • Looking at ideology by party over the last thirty years
    read more

  • Who’s watching? A look at the demographics of cable news channel watchers
    read more

  • In NBC/WSJ Data, President Trump Has Solid Standing in Key Trump Counties
    read more

  • Record 2018 turnout is powered by an “easy” voting experience
    read more

  • Key Findings from the NBC-WSJ December 2018 Poll
    read more

Public Opinion Strategies helped us to clarify what we wanted to learn and then conducted research and analysis that shed light even beyond the questions we set out to ask. They were very receptive to our suggestions, responsive to our queries, and flexible when we needed them to be.

Public Opinion Strategies has consistently offered unparalleled advice and spot-on polling that has shaped how and where we spent money and deploy key resources. Additionally, they have always been an excellent steward of limited campaign resources, ensuring we spend wisely and not a dollar more than necessary in order to get the information we need.

Robert Blizzard and Public Opinion Strategies did a great job for us throughout our successful campaign for Congress. Robert gave us accurate data, spot on analysis, and professional advice, all of which were essential to our victory.

Public Opinion Strategies is one of our go-to pollsters when it comes to testing public support for bond ballot measures and other initiative proposals. They are available to provide ongoing consultation with regard to crafting of ballot questions, public outreach messaging, and related efforts.

ACLI has worked with Public Opinion Strategies for decades, through several tough industry battles—often ones in which public opinion does not naturally fall on the side of insurers. Yet Bill and his team consistently provide invaluable strategic advice by refining our messages and helping us frame our issues in a way that makes them understandable and persuasive.

The data from Public Opinion Strategies provided important insight and informed our public awareness campaign. We sincerely appreciate their professionalism and expertise in this arena.

Nicole McCleskey and the team at Public Opinion Strategies have been invaluable to me, both during my campaigns and as Governor of the State of New Mexico. It’s not just the accuracy of their numbers, but guiding the overall strategy that makes them so valuable.

Public Opinion Strategies has been a part of our team in Missouri for more than a decade. With their data and guidance, Republicans here were able to attain a majority in the House in 2002 for the first time in fifty years, and we have been able to grow that majority to the point that we now have a record, veto-proof majority.

Lori Weigel from Public Opinion Strategies reviewed our needs and guided us toward asking the right questions. Her reporting was easy to follow and her interpretation of the data provided clear decision points.

In my tenure at two leading business associations, facing huge and complex consumer issues, I have benefitted enormously from the objective advisory skills of Bill and his team. They do their homework, they are rigorous, dispassionate and thoughtful. Turning questions into answers is a clever tag, but it’s also an apt description of the professional talents of the firm.

I consider Public Opinion Strategies to be a part of our team. That is the way we have always worked. They have helped us to understand our needs and fashioned research solutions to meet those needs. They have helped us to meet killer deadlines by being flexible, executing rapidly, and insuring quality. Teamwork is the best way to describe it.

Accuracy, speed, and deep knowledge of key issues and public sentiment are the hallmarks of quality opinion research, and on these measures Public Opinion Strategies consistently delivers. I have had the pleasure of working with Public Opinion Strategies for more than 15 years on dozens of issues, and they are undoubtedly the gold standard.

Public Opinion Strategies’ track record of success and wealth of experience in political campaigns and issue advocacy are why they are one of the most trusted and well respected public opinion firms in Washington, D.C. Their insights and perspectives have helped to inform a wide array of public affairs activities across multiple industries.