Same Song, Different Verse: Dems Continue to See Low Turnout in Primaries

This post was written by Glen Bolger and Jim Hobart

Many in the media were quick to declare the results of Tuesday’s elections as good news for Democrats. (Clearly, Democrats are desperate for any type of “good” news when the loss of one White House backed incumbent Senator, and the forcing of another incumbent Senator into a runoff is considered good news.) However, the news was not all good for Dems, as the lackluster Dem turnout we saw in Ohio and North Carolina appeared once again in Pennsylvania.

While the Pennsylvania Dem primary between Arlen Specter and Joe Sestak attracted national attention and featured millions of dollars in spending on ads by both candidates, many Pennsylvania Democrats chose to stay home rather than vote for either candidate in the primary. With over 99% of precincts reporting, 1,045,520 people had turned out to vote in the Dem Senate primary. This is close to a 200,000 vote drop off from the 2002 Dem gubernatorial primary between now Senator Bob Casey and now Governor Ed Rendell. Given the increase in Dem registration numbers in Pennsylvania since 2002, the drop off is even sharper, with turnout going from 33% in 2002 to just 24% in 2010. By percentage, turnout was actually higher on the Republican side yesterday, with 26.2% of registered Republicans turning out to vote, despite the lack of a competitive statewide primary.

In fairness to Democrats, the turnout news was better in Kentucky, where 32.2% of registered Dems turned out to vote in the competitive Dem Senate race, a significant boost from the 21.9% turnout in the Dem governor primary three years ago. However, Republicans in Kentucky saw a similar boost with 33.7% of registered Republicans voting in the GOP Senate primary, compared to just 19.8% in the 2007 primary.

With their win in PA 12, there certainly was some good news for Democrats yesterday. However, the emerging pattern of low primary turnout in key 2010 states like Ohio, North Carolina, and Pennsylvania is a problem that has the potential to hurt Democrats hopes in November far more than one special election win can help.

Similar Articles

  • Public Opinion Strategies Congratulates Karen Handel on Winning GA-06
    read more

  • The Democrats’ Pivot
    read more

  • ARE AMERICANS “OVER” PRESIDENT OBAMA?
    read more

  • POS IN THE NEWS – DECEMBER 13, 2013
    read more

  • The Cutting is the Hardest Part
    read more

Public Opinion Strategies helped us to clarify what we wanted to learn and then conducted research and analysis that shed light even beyond the questions we set out to ask. They were very receptive to our suggestions, responsive to our queries, and flexible when we needed them to be.

Public Opinion Strategies has consistently offered unparalleled advice and spot-on polling that has shaped how and where we spent money and deploy key resources. Additionally, they have always been an excellent steward of limited campaign resources, ensuring we spend wisely and not a dollar more than necessary in order to get the information we need.

Robert Blizzard and Public Opinion Strategies did a great job for us throughout our successful campaign for Congress. Robert gave us accurate data, spot on analysis, and professional advice, all of which were essential to our victory.

Public Opinion Strategies is one of our go-to pollsters when it comes to testing public support for bond ballot measures and other initiative proposals. They are available to provide ongoing consultation with regard to crafting of ballot questions, public outreach messaging, and related efforts.

ACLI has worked with Public Opinion Strategies for decades, through several tough industry battles—often ones in which public opinion does not naturally fall on the side of insurers. Yet Bill and his team consistently provide invaluable strategic advice by refining our messages and helping us frame our issues in a way that makes them understandable and persuasive.

The data from Public Opinion Strategies provided important insight and informed our public awareness campaign. We sincerely appreciate their professionalism and expertise in this arena.

Nicole McCleskey and the team at Public Opinion Strategies have been invaluable to me, both during my campaigns and as Governor of the State of New Mexico. It’s not just the accuracy of their numbers, but guiding the overall strategy that makes them so valuable.

Public Opinion Strategies has been a part of our team in Missouri for more than a decade. With their data and guidance, Republicans here were able to attain a majority in the House in 2002 for the first time in fifty years, and we have been able to grow that majority to the point that we now have a record, veto-proof majority.

In my tenure at two leading business associations, facing huge and complex consumer issues, I have benefitted enormously from the objective advisory skills of Bill and his team. They do their homework, they are rigorous, dispassionate and thoughtful. Turning questions into answers is a clever tag, but it’s also an apt description of the professional talents of the firm.

I consider Public Opinion Strategies to be a part of our team. That is the way we have always worked. They have helped us to understand our needs and fashioned research solutions to meet those needs. They have helped us to meet killer deadlines by being flexible, executing rapidly, and insuring quality. Teamwork is the best way to describe it.

Accuracy, speed, and deep knowledge of key issues and public sentiment are the hallmarks of quality opinion research, and on these measures Public Opinion Strategies consistently delivers. I have had the pleasure of working with Public Opinion Strategies for more than 15 years on dozens of issues, and they are undoubtedly the gold standard.

Public Opinion Strategies’ track record of success and wealth of experience in political campaigns and issue advocacy are why they are one of the most trusted and well respected public opinion firms in Washington, D.C. Their insights and perspectives have helped to inform a wide array of public affairs activities across multiple industries.