While my post yesterday ( ) centered on how President Obama’s second term in office is shaping up to be a sequel of his predecessor’s, there’s a ton of evidence suggesting that the coming attractions of the 2014 mid-term election cycle could mirror what happened in 2006.

While Democrats may get excited about watching a re-run of an election cycle where their party won both houses of Congress, they’re not likely to enjoy this story as much.  It’s considerably more likely that 2014, as we saw in 2006, will be an election where the President’s party loses seats in Congress and maybe even control of the US Senate.  Here’s why:

  • The ability for Obama to raise his approval rating over the next year and a half is going to be quite a challenge for the President.  While the last couple weeks have been very unkind to the President here in Washington (#Benghazi, #IRS, #APTaps), even an American rallying moment – the recent terrorist attacks in Boston – failed to produce any bounce in Obama’s approval score.

    On the day before the attacks at the Boston Marathon (April 14th), the President’s average approval rating according to Real Clear Politics was 49{09f965da52dc6ab4c1643a77bd40d1f729d807040cd8db540234bb981a782222} approve-46{09f965da52dc6ab4c1643a77bd40d1f729d807040cd8db540234bb981a782222} disapprove.  A week after the attack (April 22nd), Obama’s average approval rating hadn’t budged, sitting at 49{09f965da52dc6ab4c1643a77bd40d1f729d807040cd8db540234bb981a782222} approve-47{09f965da52dc6ab4c1643a77bd40d1f729d807040cd8db540234bb981a782222} disapprove.  Certainly no bounce.

    Here at Public Opinion Strategies, we’ve done a lot of research on this topic before: (  Nine days after the United States captured Osama Bin Laden, the President received a five-point bounce in his approval.  The lack of any bounce for Obama just one week after what happened in Boston should be pretty startling news to the White House and Democrats running in ’14 across the country.

  • So, why is it important for Democrats running in ’14 that Obama raise his approval rating?  Because history shows that the political party of a President with a sub-50{09f965da52dc6ab4c1643a77bd40d1f729d807040cd8db540234bb981a782222} approval rating tends to lose, on average, 44 seats in the House.  (And, as Patrick Lanne pointed out recently, the President’s party loses over 500 seats in state legislative races if his approval is under 50{09f965da52dc6ab4c1643a77bd40d1f729d807040cd8db540234bb981a782222}:

    While it’s very unlikely that Democrats will lose 44 seats in the US House in 2014, their chances of winning enough seats to take the Speaker’s gavel are currently pretty grim.  Those seats just don’t exist today.  In fact, according to The Cook Political Report, more of the “lean” or “toss up” seats in the House belong to Democrats (17) than Republicans (12).

    In fact, if I were a Democrat, I’d actually be much more scared about losing the US Senate than excited about winning seats in the House, especially as ALL TEN of Cook’s “lean” or “toss up” Senate seats currently belong to Democrats.

  • Democratic strategists will say that Republicans in Congress are so damaged nationally that they just aren’t trusted enough on the key issues by voters.  While there may have been some truth to that in the past, recent national polling suggests the tide is beginning to turn.  In just the past month, Congressional Republicans have held steady on “handling of the economy” and picked up ground on Congressional Democrats on other key issues:

chart 1

Bottom line – we’ve all seen this movie before in 2006.
But this time, 2014 could be a blockbuster sequel for Republicans.

Similar Articles

  • Impeachment Fever Has Hit House Democrats
    read more

  • Public Opinion Strategies Congratulates Karen Handel on Winning GA-06
    read more

  • The Democrats’ Pivot
    read more

    read more

    read more

Public Opinion Strategies helped us to clarify what we wanted to learn and then conducted research and analysis that shed light even beyond the questions we set out to ask. They were very receptive to our suggestions, responsive to our queries, and flexible when we needed them to be.

Public Opinion Strategies has consistently offered unparalleled advice and spot-on polling that has shaped how and where we spent money and deploy key resources. Additionally, they have always been an excellent steward of limited campaign resources, ensuring we spend wisely and not a dollar more than necessary in order to get the information we need.

Robert Blizzard and Public Opinion Strategies did a great job for us throughout our successful campaign for Congress. Robert gave us accurate data, spot on analysis, and professional advice, all of which were essential to our victory.

Public Opinion Strategies is one of our go-to pollsters when it comes to testing public support for bond ballot measures and other initiative proposals. They are available to provide ongoing consultation with regard to crafting of ballot questions, public outreach messaging, and related efforts.

ACLI has worked with Public Opinion Strategies for decades, through several tough industry battles—often ones in which public opinion does not naturally fall on the side of insurers. Yet Bill and his team consistently provide invaluable strategic advice by refining our messages and helping us frame our issues in a way that makes them understandable and persuasive.

The data from Public Opinion Strategies provided important insight and informed our public awareness campaign. We sincerely appreciate their professionalism and expertise in this arena.

Nicole McCleskey and the team at Public Opinion Strategies have been invaluable to me, both during my campaigns and as Governor of the State of New Mexico. It’s not just the accuracy of their numbers, but guiding the overall strategy that makes them so valuable.

Public Opinion Strategies has been a part of our team in Missouri for more than a decade. With their data and guidance, Republicans here were able to attain a majority in the House in 2002 for the first time in fifty years, and we have been able to grow that majority to the point that we now have a record, veto-proof majority.

In my tenure at two leading business associations, facing huge and complex consumer issues, I have benefitted enormously from the objective advisory skills of Bill and his team. They do their homework, they are rigorous, dispassionate and thoughtful. Turning questions into answers is a clever tag, but it’s also an apt description of the professional talents of the firm.

I consider Public Opinion Strategies to be a part of our team. That is the way we have always worked. They have helped us to understand our needs and fashioned research solutions to meet those needs. They have helped us to meet killer deadlines by being flexible, executing rapidly, and insuring quality. Teamwork is the best way to describe it.

Accuracy, speed, and deep knowledge of key issues and public sentiment are the hallmarks of quality opinion research, and on these measures Public Opinion Strategies consistently delivers. I have had the pleasure of working with Public Opinion Strategies for more than 15 years on dozens of issues, and they are undoubtedly the gold standard.

Public Opinion Strategies’ track record of success and wealth of experience in political campaigns and issue advocacy are why they are one of the most trusted and well respected public opinion firms in Washington, D.C. Their insights and perspectives have helped to inform a wide array of public affairs activities across multiple industries.

Social Media Auto Publish Powered By :