Remember: A Majority of Registered Voters Did Vote on Election Day

The day after Democrats got crushed in their second mid-term election in a row, President Obama said in a press conference he got the message.

“To everyone who voted, I want you to know that I hear you. To the two-thirds of voters who chose not to participate in the process yesterday, I hear you, too.”

Wow, two-thirds of voters didn’t vote?! If true, that would be a serious indictment of the system.

But it’s not true.

Calculating the percent of voters who voted should be no more difficult than a simple division problem: Take number of votes cast divided by number of registered voters, and you get turnout. The hardest part—projecting all the votes cast—has been helpfully done by the University of Florida’s Professor Michael P. McDonald and his United States Election Project. (You can check out his work here.)

The denominator is where it gets a little complicated. There are at least two different bases that can be used to calculate turnout, registered voters or the Voting Eligible Population (VEP). The VEP is roughly the number of adults nationwide minus those who are ineligible to vote (e.g. non-citizens and incarcerated felons). The Voting Eligible Population (VEP) base is the appropriate way to best measure election results over time, as Dr. McDonald discusses on his website, but in the everyday shorthand that has been adopted by the press and common use it is not a measurement of the turnout of “voters.”

Estimated Number of Votes Cast: 82.3 million
Estimated Number of Registered Voters: 153.2 million*
Estimated VEP: 227.2 million

Turnout Among RVs: 82.3 million ÷ 153.2 million = 53.8%
Turnout Among the VEP: 82.3 million ÷ 227.2 million = 36.2%

The President is wrong to say two-thirds of voters did not participate. While about two-thirds of the VEP did not participate, roughly 54% of registered voters did.

This year’s turnout was down slightly from 2010 (Professor McDonald counted 89.1 million votes cast for the highest office in each state four years ago), but three-fourths of the drop in turnout come from five states that account for just more than a quarter of the U.S. population. Compared to 2010, turnout was down by approximately 2.6 million in California, 800,000 in New York, 700,000 in Ohio, 500,000 in Missouri, and 500,000 in Pennsylvania. In addition to being relatively large, what these states had in common was no Senate election and either no Governor’s race or a non-competitive one.

In fact, due to a quirky luck of the draw, only 52% of the country lives in a state that did have a Senate election this year, by far the smallest percentage of any of the three Senate class elections. The lack of top-of-ticket races in this Senate class dampens turnout in a predictable manner: The last three times time this class of Senators was up for election in a non-presidential year—2002, 1990, and 1978—turnout among the VEP was closer to the 36.2% we saw this year—39.5%, 38.4%, and 39.0%, respectively. In fact, the lowest VEP turnout since the Great Depression occurred in 1942, another year this Senate class was up for election.

So, contrary to President Obama’s math, we did not see an unusually high number of voters sit this election out, and the drop in turnout we did measure can largely be attributed to the lack of competitive races in many of the most populous states.

Dr. McDonald’s work is always done with care and precision. His website makes abundantly clear the difference between the Voting Eligible Population and registered voters. It explains the reasons VEP is used, but, for goodness’ sakes, in popular lexicon it is time to retire the canard that “two-thirds of voters did not vote” or that this election represented a unique rejection of the political system.

 

 

*This estimate of registered voters comes from the U.S. Census, but is based on a 2012 estimate. It may not be a perfect number and, yes, some states allow Election Day Registration (EDR), but the point remains the same—a majority of registered voters actually voted in this election.

Similar Articles

  • Looking at ideology by party over the last thirty years
    read more

  • Who’s watching? A look at the demographics of cable news channel watchers
    read more

  • In NBC/WSJ Data, President Trump Has Solid Standing in Key Trump Counties
    read more

  • Record 2018 turnout is powered by an “easy” voting experience
    read more

  • Key Findings from the NBC-WSJ December 2018 Poll
    read more

Public Opinion Strategies helped us to clarify what we wanted to learn and then conducted research and analysis that shed light even beyond the questions we set out to ask. They were very receptive to our suggestions, responsive to our queries, and flexible when we needed them to be.

Public Opinion Strategies has consistently offered unparalleled advice and spot-on polling that has shaped how and where we spent money and deploy key resources. Additionally, they have always been an excellent steward of limited campaign resources, ensuring we spend wisely and not a dollar more than necessary in order to get the information we need.

Robert Blizzard and Public Opinion Strategies did a great job for us throughout our successful campaign for Congress. Robert gave us accurate data, spot on analysis, and professional advice, all of which were essential to our victory.

Public Opinion Strategies is one of our go-to pollsters when it comes to testing public support for bond ballot measures and other initiative proposals. They are available to provide ongoing consultation with regard to crafting of ballot questions, public outreach messaging, and related efforts.

ACLI has worked with Public Opinion Strategies for decades, through several tough industry battles—often ones in which public opinion does not naturally fall on the side of insurers. Yet Bill and his team consistently provide invaluable strategic advice by refining our messages and helping us frame our issues in a way that makes them understandable and persuasive.

The data from Public Opinion Strategies provided important insight and informed our public awareness campaign. We sincerely appreciate their professionalism and expertise in this arena.

Nicole McCleskey and the team at Public Opinion Strategies have been invaluable to me, both during my campaigns and as Governor of the State of New Mexico. It’s not just the accuracy of their numbers, but guiding the overall strategy that makes them so valuable.

Public Opinion Strategies has been a part of our team in Missouri for more than a decade. With their data and guidance, Republicans here were able to attain a majority in the House in 2002 for the first time in fifty years, and we have been able to grow that majority to the point that we now have a record, veto-proof majority.

Lori Weigel from Public Opinion Strategies reviewed our needs and guided us toward asking the right questions. Her reporting was easy to follow and her interpretation of the data provided clear decision points.

In my tenure at two leading business associations, facing huge and complex consumer issues, I have benefitted enormously from the objective advisory skills of Bill and his team. They do their homework, they are rigorous, dispassionate and thoughtful. Turning questions into answers is a clever tag, but it’s also an apt description of the professional talents of the firm.

I consider Public Opinion Strategies to be a part of our team. That is the way we have always worked. They have helped us to understand our needs and fashioned research solutions to meet those needs. They have helped us to meet killer deadlines by being flexible, executing rapidly, and insuring quality. Teamwork is the best way to describe it.

Accuracy, speed, and deep knowledge of key issues and public sentiment are the hallmarks of quality opinion research, and on these measures Public Opinion Strategies consistently delivers. I have had the pleasure of working with Public Opinion Strategies for more than 15 years on dozens of issues, and they are undoubtedly the gold standard.

Public Opinion Strategies’ track record of success and wealth of experience in political campaigns and issue advocacy are why they are one of the most trusted and well respected public opinion firms in Washington, D.C. Their insights and perspectives have helped to inform a wide array of public affairs activities across multiple industries.