Public Opinion Regarding Taking Military Action in Syria – Murky

The latest NBC News poll (conducted jointly by Public Opinion Strategies and Hart Research on August 28-29) sheds significant light on American attitudes toward potential military action against the government of Syria, but does little to clarify it.

First, consider the political environment:

  • President Obama has little political capital.  His approval score is 44% approve/48% disapprove, with just 41% approving of the way he’s handling foreign policy, and even fewer Americans (35%) approving of the job he’s doing handling the situation in Syria.

Next, there is little appetite for US military action against the Syrian government:

  • Just 42% of Americans support US military action against the Syrian government in response to the use of chemical weapons.
  • Interestingly, there is little partisan difference, as 46% of Democrats and 41% of GOP’ers support military action.

Yet, support for a limited cruise missile strike hits the 50% mark:

  • The cruise missile approach is supported by 51% of Democrats and 54% of Republicans, but attitudes are still nearly evenly divided, with Independents supporting the action by a narrow 48%-45% margin.

Despite the fact that Americans believe the use of chemical weapons is a “red line” that would require a “significant US response”…

  • By a 58%-35% margin, Americans believe the use of chemical weapons requires a significant US response, including more than 60% of both Republicans and Democrats.

Few Americans believe that taking military action against the Syrian government is in our national interest…

  • Just 21% of Americans believe that taking military action against the Syrian government is in our national interest (19% of D’s and 26% of R’s).

And, there is no consensus that taking military action will improve the situation for Syrian civilians:

  • Just 27% say that taking military action against the Syrian government will help civilians in that country, while 41% disagree, and another 31% are undecided.

The ONLY aspect of this potential military action that meets with overwhelming consensus is that President Obama should be required to receive approval from Congress prior to taking military action.

  • By a 79%-16% margin, Americans believe the President should be required to receive Congressional approval before taking military action.

Take-Aways

While Americans believe the use of chemical weapons by any country crosses a line that requires US military action, few believe that taking military action against the Syrian government is in our national interest or will even help Syrian civilians.

Seeking Congressional approval for taking military action against the government of Syria is at once the path of least (public) resistance, while also one of significant public risk for a President whose approval scores already threaten his second term agenda.

President Obama does not just need to convince Congress, but also the American public.  Across party lines, Americans are war-weary and skeptical that U.S. military action will both improve the situation in Syria and be in the national interest.

Similar Articles

  • Public Opinion Strategies Congratulates Karen Handel on Winning GA-06
    read more

  • The Democrats’ Pivot
    read more

  • ARE AMERICANS “OVER” PRESIDENT OBAMA?
    read more

  • POS IN THE NEWS – DECEMBER 13, 2013
    read more

  • The Cutting is the Hardest Part
    read more

Public Opinion Strategies helped us to clarify what we wanted to learn and then conducted research and analysis that shed light even beyond the questions we set out to ask. They were very receptive to our suggestions, responsive to our queries, and flexible when we needed them to be.

Public Opinion Strategies has consistently offered unparalleled advice and spot-on polling that has shaped how and where we spent money and deploy key resources. Additionally, they have always been an excellent steward of limited campaign resources, ensuring we spend wisely and not a dollar more than necessary in order to get the information we need.

Robert Blizzard and Public Opinion Strategies did a great job for us throughout our successful campaign for Congress. Robert gave us accurate data, spot on analysis, and professional advice, all of which were essential to our victory.

Public Opinion Strategies is one of our go-to pollsters when it comes to testing public support for bond ballot measures and other initiative proposals. They are available to provide ongoing consultation with regard to crafting of ballot questions, public outreach messaging, and related efforts.

ACLI has worked with Public Opinion Strategies for decades, through several tough industry battles—often ones in which public opinion does not naturally fall on the side of insurers. Yet Bill and his team consistently provide invaluable strategic advice by refining our messages and helping us frame our issues in a way that makes them understandable and persuasive.

The data from Public Opinion Strategies provided important insight and informed our public awareness campaign. We sincerely appreciate their professionalism and expertise in this arena.

Nicole McCleskey and the team at Public Opinion Strategies have been invaluable to me, both during my campaigns and as Governor of the State of New Mexico. It’s not just the accuracy of their numbers, but guiding the overall strategy that makes them so valuable.

Public Opinion Strategies has been a part of our team in Missouri for more than a decade. With their data and guidance, Republicans here were able to attain a majority in the House in 2002 for the first time in fifty years, and we have been able to grow that majority to the point that we now have a record, veto-proof majority.

In my tenure at two leading business associations, facing huge and complex consumer issues, I have benefitted enormously from the objective advisory skills of Bill and his team. They do their homework, they are rigorous, dispassionate and thoughtful. Turning questions into answers is a clever tag, but it’s also an apt description of the professional talents of the firm.

I consider Public Opinion Strategies to be a part of our team. That is the way we have always worked. They have helped us to understand our needs and fashioned research solutions to meet those needs. They have helped us to meet killer deadlines by being flexible, executing rapidly, and insuring quality. Teamwork is the best way to describe it.

Accuracy, speed, and deep knowledge of key issues and public sentiment are the hallmarks of quality opinion research, and on these measures Public Opinion Strategies consistently delivers. I have had the pleasure of working with Public Opinion Strategies for more than 15 years on dozens of issues, and they are undoubtedly the gold standard.

Public Opinion Strategies’ track record of success and wealth of experience in political campaigns and issue advocacy are why they are one of the most trusted and well respected public opinion firms in Washington, D.C. Their insights and perspectives have helped to inform a wide array of public affairs activities across multiple industries.