Answering the “Party of No” Attack

The newest NBC/WSJ poll  has a wealth of interesting information, and Alex Bratty will be blogging on some of those key findings over the next few days.  But, one question that Bill McInturff and Peter Hart asked caught my eye, so I’ve written a post on it.  As always, these opinions expressed on the blog do not necessarily reflect that of NBC/WSJ or Hart Research.

From time to time, they’ve asked:

“In general, do you think it is better for the same political party to control both Congress and the Presidency so they can work together more closely, or do you think it is better to have different parties controlling the Congress and the Presidency to prevent either one from going too far?”

Fully 61% prefer the two to be controlled by different parties, while 30% want the two controlled by the same party.   This is similar to the check and balance question we are asking in many districts.   It’s a question we’ll update soon, since we last asked it on a national survey about one year ago.

While we also need to point out Republican ideas and alternatives, these data provide a response to the “party of no” attack by the Democrats.  Our message should be that Democrats are going too far — on spending, health care, the deficit, not treating terrorists as enemy combatants, etc. 

Back to the 61%-30% result on this month’s NBC/WSJ poll. . .

  • In October 2008, 41% wanted the same party controlling both, while 48% wanted different parties. 
  • Democrats are unchanged from 10/08 to now.  Two years ago, Dem voters broke down as 46% same/42% different, while now they are 46% same/45% different.
  • Republicans have shifted dramatically — from 43% same/48% different in the 10/08 survey to 17% same/74% different.  That’s not surprising — Republicans know Barack Obama is President, and he’s not up for a few more years, so different is good.
  • The key finding is the attitude among Independents.  In 2008 they wanted different parties controlling, but that feeling is more exacerbated now.  In 10/08, it was 26% same/62% different among Independents, while now it is 18% same/73% different.

The number among Independents is far more meaningful now than in 2008.  Then, we were heading into an open seat Presidential election, so there was much more uncertainty about the main branch of government.  Now, voters know the Democrats control everything, and yet they want split control. 

Thus, the aforementioned check and balance message serves as a framework for Republican candidates to talk about the need for change.  One party control leads to higher spending, unethical behavior, and more waste.  Independents don’t trust those people in Washington, D.C. — and part of our message is that electing Candidate Smith is a step to making sure the Democrats don’t go too far.  (Personalize it to your individual campaign instead of using the broader Republican label).

Similar Articles

  • Public Education Update
    read more

  • Americans See China And Russia As Adversaries Posing Two Different Threats
    read more

  • A New Look At Ideology
    read more

  • Is social media your friend or a frenemy?
    read more

  • Trump’s numbers tied for his peak high as impeachment talk looms
    read more

Public Opinion Strategies helped us to clarify what we wanted to learn and then conducted research and analysis that shed light even beyond the questions we set out to ask. They were very receptive to our suggestions, responsive to our queries, and flexible when we needed them to be.

Public Opinion Strategies has consistently offered unparalleled advice and spot-on polling that has shaped how and where we spent money and deploy key resources. Additionally, they have always been an excellent steward of limited campaign resources, ensuring we spend wisely and not a dollar more than necessary in order to get the information we need.

Robert Blizzard and Public Opinion Strategies did a great job for us throughout our successful campaign for Congress. Robert gave us accurate data, spot on analysis, and professional advice, all of which were essential to our victory.

Public Opinion Strategies is one of our go-to pollsters when it comes to testing public support for bond ballot measures and other initiative proposals. They are available to provide ongoing consultation with regard to crafting of ballot questions, public outreach messaging, and related efforts.

ACLI has worked with Public Opinion Strategies for decades, through several tough industry battles—often ones in which public opinion does not naturally fall on the side of insurers. Yet Bill and his team consistently provide invaluable strategic advice by refining our messages and helping us frame our issues in a way that makes them understandable and persuasive.

The data from Public Opinion Strategies provided important insight and informed our public awareness campaign. We sincerely appreciate their professionalism and expertise in this arena.

Nicole McCleskey and the team at Public Opinion Strategies have been invaluable to me, both during my campaigns and as Governor of the State of New Mexico. It’s not just the accuracy of their numbers, but guiding the overall strategy that makes them so valuable.

Public Opinion Strategies has been a part of our team in Missouri for more than a decade. With their data and guidance, Republicans here were able to attain a majority in the House in 2002 for the first time in fifty years, and we have been able to grow that majority to the point that we now have a record, veto-proof majority.

In my tenure at two leading business associations, facing huge and complex consumer issues, I have benefitted enormously from the objective advisory skills of Bill and his team. They do their homework, they are rigorous, dispassionate and thoughtful. Turning questions into answers is a clever tag, but it’s also an apt description of the professional talents of the firm.

I consider Public Opinion Strategies to be a part of our team. That is the way we have always worked. They have helped us to understand our needs and fashioned research solutions to meet those needs. They have helped us to meet killer deadlines by being flexible, executing rapidly, and insuring quality. Teamwork is the best way to describe it.

Accuracy, speed, and deep knowledge of key issues and public sentiment are the hallmarks of quality opinion research, and on these measures Public Opinion Strategies consistently delivers. I have had the pleasure of working with Public Opinion Strategies for more than 15 years on dozens of issues, and they are undoubtedly the gold standard.

Public Opinion Strategies’ track record of success and wealth of experience in political campaigns and issue advocacy are why they are one of the most trusted and well respected public opinion firms in Washington, D.C. Their insights and perspectives have helped to inform a wide array of public affairs activities across multiple industries.

Social Media Auto Publish Powered By :