Pain at the pump: Not good for Obama

Pain at the pump: Not good for Obama

The price of gas has gone nothing but up over the last month; fifty cents per gallon, or ten percent, over the last year.

Modest economic growth, nixing the Keystone Pipeline and Iran’s continued saber-rattling over its desire to have the bomb all have one thing in common: More pain at the gas pump.  And that’s one more headache for Obama’s re-election.

If we connect gas prices with elections, it tells us a lot.  However, it’s not enough to look at nominal gas prices (you have to equalize for inflation so past gas prices paid at the pump are displayed in today’s dollars).  Fortunately, Uncle Sam helps us out with a nice website that does the work for us.  See

So what does all this tell us?

Barring a plunge in gas prices, President Obama is in real trouble.  There is a huge difference between gas prices in “status quo” years when the party in power maintained the White House or suffered only minor mid-term election losses and “change” years when the White House was lost or there were significant mid-term losses.

How big is that difference?  When analyzing the prices of a gallon of gas between 1976 and today, we find that the average paid at the pump for a gallon of regular gasoline was $1.98 in a “status quo” year compared to $2.43 paid in a change year (as measured the October prior to election day).  That’s a 23{09f965da52dc6ab4c1643a77bd40d1f729d807040cd8db540234bb981a782222}  difference in price and enough for Americans to either reward or punish their elected officials.

The average February price for a gallon of gas was $3.47 – President Obama’s gas currently costs nearly a dollar more than previous losing incumbents.  Remember, all these numbers are normalized for inflation; Uncle Sam’s web site converts everything to today’s shrunken greenback.

Low gas prices fuel the re-elect of incumbents.  In 1988, when George Herbert Walker Bush won a third term for Ronald Reagan, gas prices were $1.75.  Bill Clinton cruised to re-election over Bob Dole.  Gas prices?   A measly $1.41 paid just prior to election day in October,1996.

Just as low gas prices can juice a presidential re-elect, the data also show that high gas prices can spell doom for presidential re-elections.  A couple of examples (all in today’s dollars):

•    In 1976, Jimmy Carter beat Gerald Ford in a change year, drivers paid $2.48 for a gallon of gas in October, $0.05 cents above the “change” year average.

•    When Ronald Reagan beat Jimmy Carter in 1980, a gallon of gas in October cost $3.36, or $0.93 cents over the “change” year average.

•    In 2008, Republicans lost the White House and Barack Obama was the first Democrat since LBJ to break 50{09f965da52dc6ab4c1643a77bd40d1f729d807040cd8db540234bb981a782222}… riding $3.92 October gas prices, a whopping $1.50 above the average “change” year price.

It works in mid-terms too.  In 1998, the price paid at the pump in October was $1.41. Clinton was holding the White House, and only one Democratic incumbent was defeated (Mark Green beat Wisconsin’s Jay Johnson).  When Democrats swept both houses of Congress in 2006, many blamed it on the Iraq war.  But, gas prices were solidly in the “change” zone: drivers paying $2.53 per gallon.  When Republicans crushed the Democrats in the 2010 mid-term elections, gas prices were $2.88 prior to election day.  Ouch.

It deserves repeating: At $3.47 for a gallon of regular, current gas prices are more than a dollar over the average loser.

A dynamic that doesn’t bode well for President Obama.

Similar Articles

  • Impeachment Fever Has Hit House Democrats
    read more

  • Public Opinion Strategies Congratulates Karen Handel on Winning GA-06
    read more

  • The Democrats’ Pivot
    read more

    read more

    read more

Public Opinion Strategies helped us to clarify what we wanted to learn and then conducted research and analysis that shed light even beyond the questions we set out to ask. They were very receptive to our suggestions, responsive to our queries, and flexible when we needed them to be.

Public Opinion Strategies has consistently offered unparalleled advice and spot-on polling that has shaped how and where we spent money and deploy key resources. Additionally, they have always been an excellent steward of limited campaign resources, ensuring we spend wisely and not a dollar more than necessary in order to get the information we need.

Robert Blizzard and Public Opinion Strategies did a great job for us throughout our successful campaign for Congress. Robert gave us accurate data, spot on analysis, and professional advice, all of which were essential to our victory.

Public Opinion Strategies is one of our go-to pollsters when it comes to testing public support for bond ballot measures and other initiative proposals. They are available to provide ongoing consultation with regard to crafting of ballot questions, public outreach messaging, and related efforts.

ACLI has worked with Public Opinion Strategies for decades, through several tough industry battles—often ones in which public opinion does not naturally fall on the side of insurers. Yet Bill and his team consistently provide invaluable strategic advice by refining our messages and helping us frame our issues in a way that makes them understandable and persuasive.

The data from Public Opinion Strategies provided important insight and informed our public awareness campaign. We sincerely appreciate their professionalism and expertise in this arena.

Nicole McCleskey and the team at Public Opinion Strategies have been invaluable to me, both during my campaigns and as Governor of the State of New Mexico. It’s not just the accuracy of their numbers, but guiding the overall strategy that makes them so valuable.

Public Opinion Strategies has been a part of our team in Missouri for more than a decade. With their data and guidance, Republicans here were able to attain a majority in the House in 2002 for the first time in fifty years, and we have been able to grow that majority to the point that we now have a record, veto-proof majority.

In my tenure at two leading business associations, facing huge and complex consumer issues, I have benefitted enormously from the objective advisory skills of Bill and his team. They do their homework, they are rigorous, dispassionate and thoughtful. Turning questions into answers is a clever tag, but it’s also an apt description of the professional talents of the firm.

I consider Public Opinion Strategies to be a part of our team. That is the way we have always worked. They have helped us to understand our needs and fashioned research solutions to meet those needs. They have helped us to meet killer deadlines by being flexible, executing rapidly, and insuring quality. Teamwork is the best way to describe it.

Accuracy, speed, and deep knowledge of key issues and public sentiment are the hallmarks of quality opinion research, and on these measures Public Opinion Strategies consistently delivers. I have had the pleasure of working with Public Opinion Strategies for more than 15 years on dozens of issues, and they are undoubtedly the gold standard.

Public Opinion Strategies’ track record of success and wealth of experience in political campaigns and issue advocacy are why they are one of the most trusted and well respected public opinion firms in Washington, D.C. Their insights and perspectives have helped to inform a wide array of public affairs activities across multiple industries.

Social Media Auto Publish Powered By :