Obamaga$ could push Purple states to Red

We’ve documented the impact gas prices can have on presidential re-election numbers: when the average price for a gallon of regular gasoline is $2.43 or higher (in today’s dollars), the party that holds the White House ultimately loses the White House.

See https://pos.org/2012/03/pain-at-the-pump-not-good-for-obama/ for more.

If you doubt it, compare the price at the pump one-termers Jimmy Carter and George H.W. Bush faced going into their re-election battles ($2.58, in today’s dollars) versus that of two-termers Bill Clinton and George W. Bush ($2.06).

Fifty-two cents is the difference between four more years in the White House or playing A LOT MORE golf.  Google “golf” and “Obama” for yucks.  He already plays A LOT of golf.

But as we all know, presidential elections aren’t won at the national level.  They are won and lost in the electoral college.  And, looking at the electoral college, high gas prices could cause the perfect storm and do some real damage to President Obama’s re-elect.

The national average for a gallon of regular gas at the time this was written was $3.72.   While this average is sky-high in itself, the problem with Obamaga$ is that there are a bunch of swing states where gas prices are even higher.

First of all, let’s put aside what’s not up for grabs: even though California ($4.33), Connecticut ($3.98), Hawaii ($4.30), and New York ($3.96) have four of the five highest gas prices in America, they are among the most reliable Blue states and aren’t going anywhere.   At the same time, Alaska, despite swimming in oil, also has among the highest gas prices ($4.25) in the nation.  And, it will only get more Red.

But, if we look at the “Purple” states – those that voted for George W. Bush in 2004 but voted for Barack Obama in 2008, five of the nine are above the national average in gas prices: Florida ($3.78), Indiana ($3.81), Nevada ($3.76), North Carolina ($3.74), and Ohio ($3.75).  Together, these average $3.77 for a gallon of regular, or a buck-nineteen (in today’s dollars) over and above those when Jimmy Carter and George H.W. Bush LOST their re-elections.

More importantly, they account for 79 electoral votes.   Losing just these five Purple states would shave Obama’s margin from the 365 electoral votes he received in ‘08 to MUCH closer 286 (270 are needed).   Further handicapping?  A Republican presidential candidate has won these states a minimum of eight out of the last 13 occasions.

Before Democrats start jumping for joy over a slim victory, there is NO state in America that has gas prices that are not well over and above where past presidents have lost their re-elections.  If we look at EVERY Purple state, the average gas price is $3.71.  Carter and H.W. Bush lost with $2.06 (in today’s dollars) and NO party has maintained control of the White House with gas prices over $2.43 (in today’s dollars).

Losing all nine Purple states combined would give President Obama a 112 electoral vote haircut, dropping him from 365 to 253 and Obama would lose a close one.

How about the second and third tier states that Republicans pine for, but have only won in about a third of the last 13 presidential elections?  If Obama is forced to chase and compete for those as well, he will be in BIG trouble: Maine, Michigan, Oregon, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin.   These are Obama “must win” states; Republicans have won the White House without them.

Gasoline averages $3.82 per gallon in these states, or a buck-thirty-nine over the $2.43 LOSER LINE (today’s dollars).   These states represent an additional 57 electoral votes and losing them would give Obama a “shellacking” (his word).

The bottom line: incumbent presidents let gas prices rise at their own peril.  And Obama-ga$ is no exception.

Similar Articles

  • Impeachment Fever Has Hit House Democrats
    read more

  • Public Opinion Strategies Congratulates Karen Handel on Winning GA-06
    read more

  • The Democrats’ Pivot
    read more

  • ARE AMERICANS “OVER” PRESIDENT OBAMA?
    read more

  • POS IN THE NEWS – DECEMBER 13, 2013
    read more

Public Opinion Strategies helped us to clarify what we wanted to learn and then conducted research and analysis that shed light even beyond the questions we set out to ask. They were very receptive to our suggestions, responsive to our queries, and flexible when we needed them to be.

Public Opinion Strategies has consistently offered unparalleled advice and spot-on polling that has shaped how and where we spent money and deploy key resources. Additionally, they have always been an excellent steward of limited campaign resources, ensuring we spend wisely and not a dollar more than necessary in order to get the information we need.

Robert Blizzard and Public Opinion Strategies did a great job for us throughout our successful campaign for Congress. Robert gave us accurate data, spot on analysis, and professional advice, all of which were essential to our victory.

Public Opinion Strategies is one of our go-to pollsters when it comes to testing public support for bond ballot measures and other initiative proposals. They are available to provide ongoing consultation with regard to crafting of ballot questions, public outreach messaging, and related efforts.

ACLI has worked with Public Opinion Strategies for decades, through several tough industry battles—often ones in which public opinion does not naturally fall on the side of insurers. Yet Bill and his team consistently provide invaluable strategic advice by refining our messages and helping us frame our issues in a way that makes them understandable and persuasive.

The data from Public Opinion Strategies provided important insight and informed our public awareness campaign. We sincerely appreciate their professionalism and expertise in this arena.

Nicole McCleskey and the team at Public Opinion Strategies have been invaluable to me, both during my campaigns and as Governor of the State of New Mexico. It’s not just the accuracy of their numbers, but guiding the overall strategy that makes them so valuable.

Public Opinion Strategies has been a part of our team in Missouri for more than a decade. With their data and guidance, Republicans here were able to attain a majority in the House in 2002 for the first time in fifty years, and we have been able to grow that majority to the point that we now have a record, veto-proof majority.

In my tenure at two leading business associations, facing huge and complex consumer issues, I have benefitted enormously from the objective advisory skills of Bill and his team. They do their homework, they are rigorous, dispassionate and thoughtful. Turning questions into answers is a clever tag, but it’s also an apt description of the professional talents of the firm.

I consider Public Opinion Strategies to be a part of our team. That is the way we have always worked. They have helped us to understand our needs and fashioned research solutions to meet those needs. They have helped us to meet killer deadlines by being flexible, executing rapidly, and insuring quality. Teamwork is the best way to describe it.

Accuracy, speed, and deep knowledge of key issues and public sentiment are the hallmarks of quality opinion research, and on these measures Public Opinion Strategies consistently delivers. I have had the pleasure of working with Public Opinion Strategies for more than 15 years on dozens of issues, and they are undoubtedly the gold standard.

Public Opinion Strategies’ track record of success and wealth of experience in political campaigns and issue advocacy are why they are one of the most trusted and well respected public opinion firms in Washington, D.C. Their insights and perspectives have helped to inform a wide array of public affairs activities across multiple industries.

Social Media Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com