National Security Woes Plague Dems

Our friends across the aisle at Democracy Corps released a survey yesterday that received a lot of national attention.   Calling it a wake-up call, they noted “the results are sobering” for President Obama and the Democrats.  Their analysis is well worth reading, including the point that:

Historical doubts about the Democratic Party on national security show signs of reviving and many voters worry that the president and his administration are not dealing forcefully enough with terrorist suspects.  Additionally, the troubled economy is driving down public perceptions of America’s strength and standing in the world.

Now, they also point to solid ratings for the President on a number of national security issues, and provide strategic advice on improving the standing of liberals on national security issues.  Take the time to read their recommendations, so we know what to expect from the more liberal side of the Democratic Party.

I do want to highlight some of the key data.  As you look at this, I am going to focus on the data among likely voters.  (Not because it is better for Republicans — although it usually is — but because that’s who is, um, likely to vote):

  • Only 41% believe American is more safe from foreign threats and dangers than two years ago, while 44% believe we are less safe. 
  • Likely voters also believe the United States is less respected around the world (51%) rather than more respected (41%).
  • President Obama does have a 57% approval rating on national security (40% disapprove), and 54% approve/41% disapprove on fighting terrorism, and a 52% approve/42% disapprove on foreign policy. 
  • The President does receive a negative rating on “interrogation and prosecution of terrorism suspects” — 44% approve/51% disapprove.
  • Republicans in Congress receive a better rating (45% approve/46% disapprove) on national security than do Dems in Congress (41% approve/51% disapprove). 
  • Only 38% say Obama is doing better than George W. Bush on national security, but only 33% say he’s doing worse.  Fully 28% say they are about the same.   The numbers only change one point on “combating terrorism and handling terrorism suspects.”

They then asked a series of issues, and asked if the Dems or GOPers would do a better job with the issue.  GOPers have double digit advantages on “national security,” “keeping America safe,” “ensuring a strong military,” “combatting terrorism,” and “making America safer from nuclear threats.”  The Dems have a double digit lead on “improving global respect for America.”  (They can have that one!  While they did not ask, I have little doubt that it would have been a much lower priority for most voters when compared to the other issues.)

Finally, they did a series of partisan message testing that — unfortunately — they did not follow up with a follow-up rerating the two parties on a number of the issues to see if the message battle moved numbers.  Rather than rehash that here, go to the link above and read questions (and results) 62-72.

Republicans are in good shape on national security issues.  Remember — go after the policies, not the person.  Obama may fall further, but right now people like him more than they like what he is doing.  Eventually that catches up to him personally — albeit not yet.

This election is shaping up well for Republicans — we can run on offering balance to the big government, big spending ways of the Democrats.  Our issues are spending/debt, economy/jobs, health care, role of government, and national security.   While national security is not as red hot as some of these other issues, it does provide Republicans with another message for Independents.

Similar Articles

  • Public Education Update
    read more

  • Americans See China And Russia As Adversaries Posing Two Different Threats
    read more

  • A New Look At Ideology
    read more

  • Is social media your friend or a frenemy?
    read more

  • Trump’s numbers tied for his peak high as impeachment talk looms
    read more

Public Opinion Strategies helped us to clarify what we wanted to learn and then conducted research and analysis that shed light even beyond the questions we set out to ask. They were very receptive to our suggestions, responsive to our queries, and flexible when we needed them to be.

Public Opinion Strategies has consistently offered unparalleled advice and spot-on polling that has shaped how and where we spent money and deploy key resources. Additionally, they have always been an excellent steward of limited campaign resources, ensuring we spend wisely and not a dollar more than necessary in order to get the information we need.

Robert Blizzard and Public Opinion Strategies did a great job for us throughout our successful campaign for Congress. Robert gave us accurate data, spot on analysis, and professional advice, all of which were essential to our victory.

Public Opinion Strategies is one of our go-to pollsters when it comes to testing public support for bond ballot measures and other initiative proposals. They are available to provide ongoing consultation with regard to crafting of ballot questions, public outreach messaging, and related efforts.

ACLI has worked with Public Opinion Strategies for decades, through several tough industry battles—often ones in which public opinion does not naturally fall on the side of insurers. Yet Bill and his team consistently provide invaluable strategic advice by refining our messages and helping us frame our issues in a way that makes them understandable and persuasive.

The data from Public Opinion Strategies provided important insight and informed our public awareness campaign. We sincerely appreciate their professionalism and expertise in this arena.

Nicole McCleskey and the team at Public Opinion Strategies have been invaluable to me, both during my campaigns and as Governor of the State of New Mexico. It’s not just the accuracy of their numbers, but guiding the overall strategy that makes them so valuable.

Public Opinion Strategies has been a part of our team in Missouri for more than a decade. With their data and guidance, Republicans here were able to attain a majority in the House in 2002 for the first time in fifty years, and we have been able to grow that majority to the point that we now have a record, veto-proof majority.

In my tenure at two leading business associations, facing huge and complex consumer issues, I have benefitted enormously from the objective advisory skills of Bill and his team. They do their homework, they are rigorous, dispassionate and thoughtful. Turning questions into answers is a clever tag, but it’s also an apt description of the professional talents of the firm.

I consider Public Opinion Strategies to be a part of our team. That is the way we have always worked. They have helped us to understand our needs and fashioned research solutions to meet those needs. They have helped us to meet killer deadlines by being flexible, executing rapidly, and insuring quality. Teamwork is the best way to describe it.

Accuracy, speed, and deep knowledge of key issues and public sentiment are the hallmarks of quality opinion research, and on these measures Public Opinion Strategies consistently delivers. I have had the pleasure of working with Public Opinion Strategies for more than 15 years on dozens of issues, and they are undoubtedly the gold standard.

Public Opinion Strategies’ track record of success and wealth of experience in political campaigns and issue advocacy are why they are one of the most trusted and well respected public opinion firms in Washington, D.C. Their insights and perspectives have helped to inform a wide array of public affairs activities across multiple industries.

Social Media Auto Publish Powered By :