Lessons Learned From the Virginia Gubernatorial Race

Win or lose, there are always lessons to be learned from campaigns. Here are five lessons from Virginia:

  1. In a toss-up political environment, candidate quality matters most. The political environment has shifted back to even, away from Dem dominance. The mood of the state under a Democrat governor was mixed, and President Obama had a 51% approval rating. So the political environment was a coin flip.
      So, Bob McDonnell’s big win was a result of his superior skills as a candidate. Voters said Bob was more likable, someone they could trust, and right on the issues. He was seen as talking about what mattered right now – jobs, spending, taxes, energy/environment, and transportation. Conversely, Creigh Deeds was seen by voters as completely lacking a positive message for governing.
  2. The Republican electorate is fired up. We ask survey respondents how interested they are in the election on a scale of 1-10. In the 2005 elections in Virginia (we did the polling for Bob’s Attorney General campaign), we found Democrats were seven points more likely than Republicans to rate their interest as a 10 (top end of the scale).
      This year, even at the end of the campaign, Republican interest was twenty points higher than Democrats (54% to 34%). In the years of asking this question, I’ve never seen such a wide disparity between the two parties. As campaign chairman Ed Gillespie was fond of saying, “the most dangerous place to be on Election Day is between a Republican and the ballot box.”
  3. Issues matter. Bob McDonnell talked about jobs, spending, taxes, transportation, and the three E’s – energy, the environment (green jobs), and education. On the issue handling section, Bob won jobs (the most important issue) by nearly 20 points. He won transportation (the Northern Virginia issue) by 17 points. He crushed on taxes and spending, and tied on education.  As Attorney General, Bob establish a record of accomplishments that received bi-partisan support.
  4. Turnout can not overcome a failed message. Turnout programs can make a winner out of a campaign that would otherwise lose a close election, but can’t do anything for a campaign that had no message. For all of the Democratics (they don’t like being called a Democrat) bragging about their turnout program, their voters had no reason to actually vote.
  5. Off-year elections ARE a referendum on the party in power. While the political environment did not overwhelmingly favor Republicans (as it did for Dems in 2005 and 2007), we were running down a gentle slope with the wind at our back. Our issue messages about spending and taxes would not have resonated in recent years, but the Obama Administration’s policies have put these GOP strength issues front and center with the electorate once again. Taxes and spending are back! That wasn’t Deeds’ doing, it was the larger national force of the Obama/Democratic Congress working to help us out.
      Also, the notion that Obama did not do much to help Deeds is laughable based on the clear-cut evidence. Not only did Obama do two rallies for Deeds, they also sent numerous emails, direct mail, and most likely recorded calls. The Obama political team tried a bluff equivalent to a World Series of Poker star – “we’re not involved,” and then they went all in.
Similar Articles

  • Public Education Update
    read more

  • Americans See China And Russia As Adversaries Posing Two Different Threats
    read more

  • A New Look At Ideology
    read more

  • Is social media your friend or a frenemy?
    read more

  • Trump’s numbers tied for his peak high as impeachment talk looms
    read more

Public Opinion Strategies helped us to clarify what we wanted to learn and then conducted research and analysis that shed light even beyond the questions we set out to ask. They were very receptive to our suggestions, responsive to our queries, and flexible when we needed them to be.

Public Opinion Strategies has consistently offered unparalleled advice and spot-on polling that has shaped how and where we spent money and deploy key resources. Additionally, they have always been an excellent steward of limited campaign resources, ensuring we spend wisely and not a dollar more than necessary in order to get the information we need.

Robert Blizzard and Public Opinion Strategies did a great job for us throughout our successful campaign for Congress. Robert gave us accurate data, spot on analysis, and professional advice, all of which were essential to our victory.

Public Opinion Strategies is one of our go-to pollsters when it comes to testing public support for bond ballot measures and other initiative proposals. They are available to provide ongoing consultation with regard to crafting of ballot questions, public outreach messaging, and related efforts.

ACLI has worked with Public Opinion Strategies for decades, through several tough industry battles—often ones in which public opinion does not naturally fall on the side of insurers. Yet Bill and his team consistently provide invaluable strategic advice by refining our messages and helping us frame our issues in a way that makes them understandable and persuasive.

The data from Public Opinion Strategies provided important insight and informed our public awareness campaign. We sincerely appreciate their professionalism and expertise in this arena.

Nicole McCleskey and the team at Public Opinion Strategies have been invaluable to me, both during my campaigns and as Governor of the State of New Mexico. It’s not just the accuracy of their numbers, but guiding the overall strategy that makes them so valuable.

Public Opinion Strategies has been a part of our team in Missouri for more than a decade. With their data and guidance, Republicans here were able to attain a majority in the House in 2002 for the first time in fifty years, and we have been able to grow that majority to the point that we now have a record, veto-proof majority.

In my tenure at two leading business associations, facing huge and complex consumer issues, I have benefitted enormously from the objective advisory skills of Bill and his team. They do their homework, they are rigorous, dispassionate and thoughtful. Turning questions into answers is a clever tag, but it’s also an apt description of the professional talents of the firm.

I consider Public Opinion Strategies to be a part of our team. That is the way we have always worked. They have helped us to understand our needs and fashioned research solutions to meet those needs. They have helped us to meet killer deadlines by being flexible, executing rapidly, and insuring quality. Teamwork is the best way to describe it.

Accuracy, speed, and deep knowledge of key issues and public sentiment are the hallmarks of quality opinion research, and on these measures Public Opinion Strategies consistently delivers. I have had the pleasure of working with Public Opinion Strategies for more than 15 years on dozens of issues, and they are undoubtedly the gold standard.

Public Opinion Strategies’ track record of success and wealth of experience in political campaigns and issue advocacy are why they are one of the most trusted and well respected public opinion firms in Washington, D.C. Their insights and perspectives have helped to inform a wide array of public affairs activities across multiple industries.

Social Media Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com