Hillary’s Terrible, Horrible, No Good, Very Bad Favorable Ratings

We have been spending months talking about Hillary Clinton’s historically low ratings compared to past presidential candidates.

Our concern is people get inured to hearing this and, unless you really look at these numbers, you cannot appreciate how terrible Hillary Clinton’s favorable ratings are. So, we delved deeper into the data.

Below are basic sub-groups and the total net positive/negative rating, which demonstrate how negative Clinton’s ratings are compared to a very polarizing president in his re-election campaign.

Feeling Thermometer Comparison
(Total Positive – Total Negative)


The second chart highlights white sub-groups only. Obama had weak numbers among white voters, but this chart highlights Clinton’s truly awful numbers among these voters. She is a net -29 points lower among white college educated women compared to Obama. Her incredibly weak numbers with white men without a college degree are without precedent for a presidential candidate in Bill’s McInturff’s career.

Feeling Thermometer Comparison Among White Sub-Groups
(Total Positive – Total Negative)


As another comparison, Obama reached his lowest point ever with whites without college degrees (-32{09f965da52dc6ab4c1643a77bd40d1f729d807040cd8db540234bb981a782222}) in October 2014 and in January of this year. Hillary Clinton exceeded Obama’s low in July 2015 (-34{09f965da52dc6ab4c1643a77bd40d1f729d807040cd8db540234bb981a782222}) and took off like a rocket ship thereafter – her lowest point being April of this year (-53{09f965da52dc6ab4c1643a77bd40d1f729d807040cd8db540234bb981a782222}) and -47{09f965da52dc6ab4c1643a77bd40d1f729d807040cd8db540234bb981a782222} today.

The third chart shows the “very negative” number to again help highlight that as bad as Obama’s numbers were with Republicans, Clinton is still double-digits worse.

Feeling Thermometer Comparison
(Very Negative)

very neg

Finally, it is the last chart that – to us – is the killer: Clinton has a net positive rating among only FOUR sub-groups:

  • African Americans
  • Democrats
  • Liberals
  • Latinos

As we have been saying in many of our recent blog posts, we have NEVER seen anything like this. When talking in 2012, a common talking point was that “other than the Democratic coalition sub-groups (such as African Americans, liberals, Latinos, younger voters, people less than 30K, the Northeast) Obama had very few ‘up-for-grabs’ sub-groups where he had a net positive rating.” This format allows you to see how relatively fulsome Obama was in terms of having a net positive rating compared to Clinton!

Feeling Thermometer Comparison
Among Sub-Groups Where Obama is a Net Neutral to Net Positive

neutral to positive

What makes 2016 difficult to predict: Hillary Clinton’s terrible, horrible, no good, very bad favorable ratings that are unmatched by any other Democratic candidate for president ever.

Similar Articles

  • Tattoos, Pot and Football: Our Daily Lives Reflected in WSJ/NBC News Polls
    read more

  • Public Opinion Strategies Polls in 18 Successful 2019 Elections
    read more

  • National Survey: Health Insurance Costs Top Health Care Concerns for Voters
    read more

  • Public Education Update
    read more

  • Public Release of Research: Strengthening HCAHPS Patient Experience Surveying
    read more

Public Opinion Strategies helped us to clarify what we wanted to learn and then conducted research and analysis that shed light even beyond the questions we set out to ask. They were very receptive to our suggestions, responsive to our queries, and flexible when we needed them to be.

Public Opinion Strategies has consistently offered unparalleled advice and spot-on polling that has shaped how and where we spent money and deploy key resources. Additionally, they have always been an excellent steward of limited campaign resources, ensuring we spend wisely and not a dollar more than necessary in order to get the information we need.

Robert Blizzard and Public Opinion Strategies did a great job for us throughout our successful campaign for Congress. Robert gave us accurate data, spot on analysis, and professional advice, all of which were essential to our victory.

Public Opinion Strategies is one of our go-to pollsters when it comes to testing public support for bond ballot measures and other initiative proposals. They are available to provide ongoing consultation with regard to crafting of ballot questions, public outreach messaging, and related efforts.

ACLI has worked with Public Opinion Strategies for decades, through several tough industry battles—often ones in which public opinion does not naturally fall on the side of insurers. Yet Bill and his team consistently provide invaluable strategic advice by refining our messages and helping us frame our issues in a way that makes them understandable and persuasive.

The data from Public Opinion Strategies provided important insight and informed our public awareness campaign. We sincerely appreciate their professionalism and expertise in this arena.

Nicole McCleskey and the team at Public Opinion Strategies have been invaluable to me, both during my campaigns and as Governor of the State of New Mexico. It’s not just the accuracy of their numbers, but guiding the overall strategy that makes them so valuable.

Public Opinion Strategies has been a part of our team in Missouri for more than a decade. With their data and guidance, Republicans here were able to attain a majority in the House in 2002 for the first time in fifty years, and we have been able to grow that majority to the point that we now have a record, veto-proof majority.

In my tenure at two leading business associations, facing huge and complex consumer issues, I have benefitted enormously from the objective advisory skills of Bill and his team. They do their homework, they are rigorous, dispassionate and thoughtful. Turning questions into answers is a clever tag, but it’s also an apt description of the professional talents of the firm.

I consider Public Opinion Strategies to be a part of our team. That is the way we have always worked. They have helped us to understand our needs and fashioned research solutions to meet those needs. They have helped us to meet killer deadlines by being flexible, executing rapidly, and insuring quality. Teamwork is the best way to describe it.

Accuracy, speed, and deep knowledge of key issues and public sentiment are the hallmarks of quality opinion research, and on these measures Public Opinion Strategies consistently delivers. I have had the pleasure of working with Public Opinion Strategies for more than 15 years on dozens of issues, and they are undoubtedly the gold standard.

Public Opinion Strategies’ track record of success and wealth of experience in political campaigns and issue advocacy are why they are one of the most trusted and well respected public opinion firms in Washington, D.C. Their insights and perspectives have helped to inform a wide array of public affairs activities across multiple industries.

Social Media Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com