Hillary Clinton & Donald Trump Make Political History. But Not In A Good Way,.

The two Real Clear Politics frontrunners based on the average of the national polls, Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton, have already reached a dubious historical point that no other recent open seat Presidential candidate has done – sky high negatives!

The dynamic duo of the 2016 race are despised by Americans. While this nation has been skeptical of politicians even before tea was dumped into Boston Harbor, Trump and Clinton take the cake.

Looking at the three most recent open seat Presidential contests, none of the other main candidates ever reached the level of negatives that Hillary and The Donald are already currently at.

In the latest NBC/WSJ poll, Trump fares the worst with Americans, having just a 27{09f965da52dc6ab4c1643a77bd40d1f729d807040cd8db540234bb981a782222} positive/59{09f965da52dc6ab4c1643a77bd40d1f729d807040cd8db540234bb981a782222} negative image! In the words of Trump, those are yuuuge negatives! In fact, only 12{09f965da52dc6ab4c1643a77bd40d1f729d807040cd8db540234bb981a782222} are very positive, while 47{09f965da52dc6ab4c1643a77bd40d1f729d807040cd8db540234bb981a782222} are very negative.

To quote Trump, those numbers belong to a “loser.” They are more “ridiculous” and a “disaster” than “excellence,” “phenomenal,” “wonderful,” “amazing,” “fantastic,” “fabulous,” or “spectacular.” No, Donald, 27{09f965da52dc6ab4c1643a77bd40d1f729d807040cd8db540234bb981a782222} positive/59{09f965da52dc6ab4c1643a77bd40d1f729d807040cd8db540234bb981a782222} negative does not make you a “winner!”

While the Democrats are publicly attacking Trump despite privately wishing for him to be the GOP’s nominee, they have their own problems. While Donald Trump is not likely to be the GOP nominee for a whole host of reasons, Hillary Clinton is cruising to the Democratic nomination despite her 37{09f965da52dc6ab4c1643a77bd40d1f729d807040cd8db540234bb981a782222} positive/48{09f965da52dc6ab4c1643a77bd40d1f729d807040cd8db540234bb981a782222} negative image rating with Americans overall.

While that is a whopping 21 net points better than Trump’s image, Hillary faces significant perceptual problems.

First, look at the images of the other leading competitors:

While that’s interesting and we will see some change in the images of Sanders, Carson, Rubio, and Cruz throughout the winter, the clearest indicator of the trauma that The Donald and Hillary are going through is comparisons with historical data.

I went back and looked at the worst images for the candidates in the last three open seat Presidential races – 1988, 2000, and 2008. None of the candidates were in the same neighborhood of negatives as Trump and Clinton:

So, just eight short years ago, neither Barack Obama nor John McCain were underwater on their images. Even at a time when the Republican brand was collapsing, the Maverick from Arizona was still more liked than disliked.

And, in 2000, the polarized election that lasted until mid-December, Al Gore’s negatives never got above 38{09f965da52dc6ab4c1643a77bd40d1f729d807040cd8db540234bb981a782222}. He was underwater, but only by a point. For a candidate whose woodenness and, er, unusual speech cadence were ripped by the Democrats after he lost, Gore was disliked but not despised like Trump and Clinton are.

Only in 1988, at the very end of the campaign, was Michael Dukakis’s image essentially on the same level as Hillary and Donald. The man in the tank tanked at the end, dropping to a 30{09f965da52dc6ab4c1643a77bd40d1f729d807040cd8db540234bb981a782222} favorable/43{09f965da52dc6ab4c1643a77bd40d1f729d807040cd8db540234bb981a782222} unfavorable image on November 2nd (CBS/NY Times polling). At his worst pre-election, George H.W. Bush was a couple of points underwater at 33{09f965da52dc6ab4c1643a77bd40d1f729d807040cd8db540234bb981a782222} fav/35{09f965da52dc6ab4c1643a77bd40d1f729d807040cd8db540234bb981a782222} unfav in May. He steadily recovered throughout the summer.

Hillary’s image is likely to improve a bit as she becomes the Democratic nominee. If Trump does falter and fails to become the nominee, it is likely that Hillary will have the highest negatives of any major party candidate going into an open seat Presidential election.

Right now, Hillary’s image is already worse than any major party candidate in the history of NBC/WSJ presidential polling had in October of the election year, from 1992 to 2012. So, while the candidates in the last six presidential elections were suffering the slings and arrows of negative ads and daily attacks in October before the election, Hillary is worse off now than they were despite the fact that she is going through a rather benign primary.

Team Clinton should know that hoping that Donald Trump is the GOP nominee is not a strategy. Meanwhile, all of her image resets so far have failed. In an election where Republicans have a major math problem in both the Electoral College and the demographic make-up of the electorate, Hillary will start with a major math problem of her own. Barack Obama was wrong – Hillary is not likable enough. 

Similar Articles

  • Public Opinion Strategies Polls in 18 Successful 2019 Elections
    read more

  • National Survey: Health Insurance Costs Top Health Care Concerns for Voters
    read more

  • Public Education Update
    read more

  • Public Release of Research: Strengthening HCAHPS Patient Experience Surveying
    read more

  • Republicans and the 2020 Election
    read more

Public Opinion Strategies helped us to clarify what we wanted to learn and then conducted research and analysis that shed light even beyond the questions we set out to ask. They were very receptive to our suggestions, responsive to our queries, and flexible when we needed them to be.

Public Opinion Strategies has consistently offered unparalleled advice and spot-on polling that has shaped how and where we spent money and deploy key resources. Additionally, they have always been an excellent steward of limited campaign resources, ensuring we spend wisely and not a dollar more than necessary in order to get the information we need.

Robert Blizzard and Public Opinion Strategies did a great job for us throughout our successful campaign for Congress. Robert gave us accurate data, spot on analysis, and professional advice, all of which were essential to our victory.

Public Opinion Strategies is one of our go-to pollsters when it comes to testing public support for bond ballot measures and other initiative proposals. They are available to provide ongoing consultation with regard to crafting of ballot questions, public outreach messaging, and related efforts.

ACLI has worked with Public Opinion Strategies for decades, through several tough industry battles—often ones in which public opinion does not naturally fall on the side of insurers. Yet Bill and his team consistently provide invaluable strategic advice by refining our messages and helping us frame our issues in a way that makes them understandable and persuasive.

The data from Public Opinion Strategies provided important insight and informed our public awareness campaign. We sincerely appreciate their professionalism and expertise in this arena.

Nicole McCleskey and the team at Public Opinion Strategies have been invaluable to me, both during my campaigns and as Governor of the State of New Mexico. It’s not just the accuracy of their numbers, but guiding the overall strategy that makes them so valuable.

Public Opinion Strategies has been a part of our team in Missouri for more than a decade. With their data and guidance, Republicans here were able to attain a majority in the House in 2002 for the first time in fifty years, and we have been able to grow that majority to the point that we now have a record, veto-proof majority.

In my tenure at two leading business associations, facing huge and complex consumer issues, I have benefitted enormously from the objective advisory skills of Bill and his team. They do their homework, they are rigorous, dispassionate and thoughtful. Turning questions into answers is a clever tag, but it’s also an apt description of the professional talents of the firm.

I consider Public Opinion Strategies to be a part of our team. That is the way we have always worked. They have helped us to understand our needs and fashioned research solutions to meet those needs. They have helped us to meet killer deadlines by being flexible, executing rapidly, and insuring quality. Teamwork is the best way to describe it.

Accuracy, speed, and deep knowledge of key issues and public sentiment are the hallmarks of quality opinion research, and on these measures Public Opinion Strategies consistently delivers. I have had the pleasure of working with Public Opinion Strategies for more than 15 years on dozens of issues, and they are undoubtedly the gold standard.

Public Opinion Strategies’ track record of success and wealth of experience in political campaigns and issue advocacy are why they are one of the most trusted and well respected public opinion firms in Washington, D.C. Their insights and perspectives have helped to inform a wide array of public affairs activities across multiple industries.

Social Media Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com