Government-Run Health Care: They Can’t Be For Real….It Must Be A (Bad) Dream

If health care reform wasn’t such a serious issue with the lives and welfare of millions of Americans at stake, I might think President Obama and Democrats in Congress were playing one big national prank on us by suggesting the government should run health care.

But, the fact is, health care reform IS a serious issue, and so I have to presume then that the whole idea of government-run health care is in fact a bad dream; nay, a nightmare.

Consider the government’s recent report card:

  • Yesterday, the government-run aviation system failed, causing a domino effect of flight delays and cancellations for busy travelers across the country.
  • Jobs “created or saved” from the government stimulus package have in some cases been double and triple counted, and they’ve been “created and saved” in non-existent Congressional districts. Even the Administration’s director of communications for the stimulus package responded, “who knows man, who really knows” when questioned about the bogus job numbers.
  • As swine flu has swept the nation, the government’s response was recommending everyone get the H1N1 vaccination…oops, but there aren’t any vaccines to get because the government failed to provide them. (Interestingly though, they managed to find enough in the supply chain to give to detainees at Guantanamo Bay.)

The list of examples that demonstrate the government’s incompetence and ineptitude at running and managing a variety of programs and systems goes on and on…but I don’t need to…you get my point.

And, the American people get the point too. In March, just as health care reform was starting to be discussed in earnest, we asked Americans about the government’s role. Back then voters were split between providing government-run health care or it not being the government’s responsibility . Today, as Americans have watched the debate play out, they recognize the nightmare this might be, and by a 17-point margin they say it is not the government’s responsibility.*

alex-blog-post-nov-20 

Underscoring this finding, a recent Gallup survey** shows for the first time a majority (50{09f965da52dc6ab4c1643a77bd40d1f729d807040cd8db540234bb981a782222}) saying it is not the federal government’s responsibility to make sure all Americans have health coverage (47{09f965da52dc6ab4c1643a77bd40d1f729d807040cd8db540234bb981a782222} say it is the government’s responsibility). And, in the latest ABC News/Washington Post poll,*** 60{09f965da52dc6ab4c1643a77bd40d1f729d807040cd8db540234bb981a782222} of Americans say it is likely that a new government health insurance plan would force many private health insurers to go out of business because they couldn’t compete. A slew of other recently released polls also tell us Americans are saying they think their quality of care will go down and their costs will go up if President Obama and the Democrats in Congress pass their plan.

We have to wonder if the President and his Democratic caucus are paying any attention at all to the wish of the voters. They are so obsessed with passing their plan and meeting their liberal agenda that they’ve forgotten to consider the consequences of passing legislation that plunges Americans into the nightmare scenario of relying on the government for their care. If that happens, Americans might just give them a dose of their own medicine and deliver Democrats with their worst nightmare next November.

*Data from Public Opinion Strategies National Health Care Reform Survey, conducted November 9-11, 2009 among 700 registered voters.
**Data from Gallup national survey, compare home insurance companies conducted November 5-8, 2009 among 1,008 adults.
***Data from ABC News/Washington Post national survey, conducted November 12-15, 2009 among 1,001 adults.

 

Similar Articles

  • Looking at ideology by party over the last thirty years
    read more

  • In NBC/WSJ Data, President Trump Has Solid Standing in Key Trump Counties
    read more

  • Record 2018 turnout is powered by an “easy” voting experience
    read more

  • A Year-to-Year Look At President Trump’s Approval Rating
    read more

  • Following the 2018 election, 60% of Democrat voters say U.S. political and economic systems are stacked against people like them
    read more

Public Opinion Strategies helped us to clarify what we wanted to learn and then conducted research and analysis that shed light even beyond the questions we set out to ask. They were very receptive to our suggestions, responsive to our queries, and flexible when we needed them to be.

Public Opinion Strategies has consistently offered unparalleled advice and spot-on polling that has shaped how and where we spent money and deploy key resources. Additionally, they have always been an excellent steward of limited campaign resources, ensuring we spend wisely and not a dollar more than necessary in order to get the information we need.

Robert Blizzard and Public Opinion Strategies did a great job for us throughout our successful campaign for Congress. Robert gave us accurate data, spot on analysis, and professional advice, all of which were essential to our victory.

Public Opinion Strategies is one of our go-to pollsters when it comes to testing public support for bond ballot measures and other initiative proposals. They are available to provide ongoing consultation with regard to crafting of ballot questions, public outreach messaging, and related efforts.

ACLI has worked with Public Opinion Strategies for decades, through several tough industry battles—often ones in which public opinion does not naturally fall on the side of insurers. Yet Bill and his team consistently provide invaluable strategic advice by refining our messages and helping us frame our issues in a way that makes them understandable and persuasive.

The data from Public Opinion Strategies provided important insight and informed our public awareness campaign. We sincerely appreciate their professionalism and expertise in this arena.

Nicole McCleskey and the team at Public Opinion Strategies have been invaluable to me, both during my campaigns and as Governor of the State of New Mexico. It’s not just the accuracy of their numbers, but guiding the overall strategy that makes them so valuable.

Public Opinion Strategies has been a part of our team in Missouri for more than a decade. With their data and guidance, Republicans here were able to attain a majority in the House in 2002 for the first time in fifty years, and we have been able to grow that majority to the point that we now have a record, veto-proof majority.

Lori Weigel from Public Opinion Strategies reviewed our needs and guided us toward asking the right questions. Her reporting was easy to follow and her interpretation of the data provided clear decision points.

In my tenure at two leading business associations, facing huge and complex consumer issues, I have benefitted enormously from the objective advisory skills of Bill and his team. They do their homework, they are rigorous, dispassionate and thoughtful. Turning questions into answers is a clever tag, but it’s also an apt description of the professional talents of the firm.

I consider Public Opinion Strategies to be a part of our team. That is the way we have always worked. They have helped us to understand our needs and fashioned research solutions to meet those needs. They have helped us to meet killer deadlines by being flexible, executing rapidly, and insuring quality. Teamwork is the best way to describe it.

Accuracy, speed, and deep knowledge of key issues and public sentiment are the hallmarks of quality opinion research, and on these measures Public Opinion Strategies consistently delivers. I have had the pleasure of working with Public Opinion Strategies for more than 15 years on dozens of issues, and they are undoubtedly the gold standard.

Public Opinion Strategies’ track record of success and wealth of experience in political campaigns and issue advocacy are why they are one of the most trusted and well respected public opinion firms in Washington, D.C. Their insights and perspectives have helped to inform a wide array of public affairs activities across multiple industries.