Democrats Denying Climate Change

The changes in political climate over the last year have been well-documented on this blog and elsewhere. From the scorching heat of town hall meetings last summer that wilted the blooms of legislative momentum, to the earlier-than-expected reddening of the electoral leaves in Virginia and New Jersey in the fall, and the blistering winds of change that blew through Massachusetts in mid-January, voters signaled their intent:  they want to cap-and-trade in their Democrat leaders after seeing the growth of the federal government, via national health care, take a dramatic upward turn like a big Canadian-style hockey stick.

On our most recent survey conducted in partnership with Newt Gingrich and the Center for Health Transformation, voters shed new light on how global this change has been. We read two statements and asked voters which came closer to voters views.
The results were:

49% America needs more self-reliance and personal responsibility.
…or…
46% America needs more sense of community and people helping one another.

Overall, the difference was within the margin of error (+/- 3.3%), but compared to November 2007, when 41% of registered voters identified more with the Personal Responsibility statement and 54% chose the Community statement (a net 16 pt difference), the results represent a sea-change in an important measure of the core values of the electorate.

As the table below shows, women at home and well-educated voters are among top groups shifting away from the community statement:

% Choosing Community Statement
2007 2010 Diff
Women working at home 61% 41% -20%
Post Graduates 57% 42% -15%
Republicans 40% 28% -12%
Conservatives 44% 32% -12%
Moderates 57% 48% -9%
Women 55% 48% -7%
Independents 52% 45% -7%

The drop is evident across all regions, and especially in the Northeast:

% Choosing Community Statement
2007 2010 Diff
Northeast 64% 48% -16%
South 53% 46% -7%
West 50% 44% -6%
Midwest 50% 45% -5%

And, while 18-34 year olds remain unchanged, the drops span the generational divide for those 35 and over:

% Choosing Community Statement
2007 2010 Diff
Ages 18-34 60% 60%
Ages 35-44 53% 42% -11%
Ages 45-54 59% 47% -12%
Ages 55-64 49% 43% -6%
Seniors 65+ 51% 38% -13%

There is evidence that this is bigger than just the health care debate. Indeed, a recent CNN poll found that fifty six percent (56%) of Americans believe the ‘federal government has become so large and powerful that it poses an immediate threat to the rights and freedoms of ordinary citizens.’

But Democrats remain unimpressed by the evidence all around them and continue to move forward with big government entitlements and sweeping reforms, believing strongly that the electorate can be convinced that their alarm is baseless and they needn’t worry so much about the natural growth of big government, even as blue states and districts on the east coast are melted by the intensity of  red-hot GOP voters. Unfortunately, ignoring this problem may only make it worse. Can Democrats afford to continue to deny the political climate change all around them?

Similar Articles

  • Trump’s numbers tied for his peak high as impeachment talk looms
    read more

  • Independents Key to Trump Approval Boost
    read more

  • Looking at ideology by party over the last thirty years
    read more

  • In NBC/WSJ Data, President Trump Has Solid Standing in Key Trump Counties
    read more

  • Record 2018 turnout is powered by an “easy” voting experience
    read more

Public Opinion Strategies helped us to clarify what we wanted to learn and then conducted research and analysis that shed light even beyond the questions we set out to ask. They were very receptive to our suggestions, responsive to our queries, and flexible when we needed them to be.

Public Opinion Strategies has consistently offered unparalleled advice and spot-on polling that has shaped how and where we spent money and deploy key resources. Additionally, they have always been an excellent steward of limited campaign resources, ensuring we spend wisely and not a dollar more than necessary in order to get the information we need.

Robert Blizzard and Public Opinion Strategies did a great job for us throughout our successful campaign for Congress. Robert gave us accurate data, spot on analysis, and professional advice, all of which were essential to our victory.

Public Opinion Strategies is one of our go-to pollsters when it comes to testing public support for bond ballot measures and other initiative proposals. They are available to provide ongoing consultation with regard to crafting of ballot questions, public outreach messaging, and related efforts.

ACLI has worked with Public Opinion Strategies for decades, through several tough industry battles—often ones in which public opinion does not naturally fall on the side of insurers. Yet Bill and his team consistently provide invaluable strategic advice by refining our messages and helping us frame our issues in a way that makes them understandable and persuasive.

The data from Public Opinion Strategies provided important insight and informed our public awareness campaign. We sincerely appreciate their professionalism and expertise in this arena.

Nicole McCleskey and the team at Public Opinion Strategies have been invaluable to me, both during my campaigns and as Governor of the State of New Mexico. It’s not just the accuracy of their numbers, but guiding the overall strategy that makes them so valuable.

Public Opinion Strategies has been a part of our team in Missouri for more than a decade. With their data and guidance, Republicans here were able to attain a majority in the House in 2002 for the first time in fifty years, and we have been able to grow that majority to the point that we now have a record, veto-proof majority.

In my tenure at two leading business associations, facing huge and complex consumer issues, I have benefitted enormously from the objective advisory skills of Bill and his team. They do their homework, they are rigorous, dispassionate and thoughtful. Turning questions into answers is a clever tag, but it’s also an apt description of the professional talents of the firm.

I consider Public Opinion Strategies to be a part of our team. That is the way we have always worked. They have helped us to understand our needs and fashioned research solutions to meet those needs. They have helped us to meet killer deadlines by being flexible, executing rapidly, and insuring quality. Teamwork is the best way to describe it.

Accuracy, speed, and deep knowledge of key issues and public sentiment are the hallmarks of quality opinion research, and on these measures Public Opinion Strategies consistently delivers. I have had the pleasure of working with Public Opinion Strategies for more than 15 years on dozens of issues, and they are undoubtedly the gold standard.

Public Opinion Strategies’ track record of success and wealth of experience in political campaigns and issue advocacy are why they are one of the most trusted and well respected public opinion firms in Washington, D.C. Their insights and perspectives have helped to inform a wide array of public affairs activities across multiple industries.