Democracy Corps Poll Shows Stronger GOP Messages on the Economy

The semi-secret Democracy Corps poll that I’ve been blogging about all week (here, here, and here) is chock-full of heavenly data.  It really is interesting — and my focus spurred our friends on the left to write a response

The last analysis I’m going to write on it focuses on their economic message testing for the two parties.  It’s a very interesting and well-done series.  The good news for Republicans is that the intensity of support for the GOP messages on the economy is stronger than the intensity of support for the Dem messages.

As a reminder, the survey was done of 1,500 total voters — 500 in 20 Tier 1 Dem congressional seats, 500 in 20 Tier 2 Dem congressional seats, and 500 in 20 targeted GOP congressional seats.  Often in these analysis I have been separating out the Dem and GOP seats, but for the message testing component of their survey, I’m going to focus on the overall data for the 1,500 interviews (so all 60 seats combined).

They tested a series of messages about what both the Dems and the GOPers “might say about the economy” and then asked how convincing respondents found each statement.  The results of the six Dem messages point to some that have credibility with a majority of voters in these 60 districts, but those messages lack intensity.   In comparison, they tested four GOP messages on the economy, and all four have higher intensity than any of the six Dem messages.  Three of the four GOP messages have significantly more pop (a quick shout out of thanks to the folks at Democracy Corps for writing such well-crafted GOP messages for us to steal).

Here’s the wording of the Dem messages, with the results:

This past winter our nation was facing the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression, 700,000 jobs were being lost per month and our financial system was on the verge of collapse. We still have a long way to go and we will not rest until those Americans who seek jobs can find them, but thanks to the bold and decisive actions we have taken since January, we have pulled this economy back from the brink.  Results: 43% convincing, 55% not convincing.  Intensity: 16% very convincing.

We inherited an economy that has left far too many Americans struggling to make ends meet, so we are acting to help them get through this crisis by extending unemployment and health care benefits to Americans who lost their jobs, cutting taxes for 95 percent of working families, and preventing thousands of police officers, teachers and firefighters from being laid off. And as we move forward we are working to make sure that the economy starts to create new jobs again as it begins to pull out of this recession.  Results: 56% convincing, 43% not convincing.  Intensity: 26% very convincing.

 When President Obama was sworn in, almost 750 thousand Americans were losing their job every month. The actions we’ve taken have cut that number by two-thirds, so we’ve made progress in stemming the loss of jobs. But we are not satisfied and a jobless recovery isn’t good enough for us or the American people; that is why we won’t stop fighting until our economy is once again creating high quality jobs.  Results: 53% convincing, 45% not convincing.  Intensity: 20% very convincing.

Last year our economy was on the verge of collapse so we had to make the tough choices and act, even though we knew it would be unpopular because it would help Wall Street. Now that we’ve averted the worst, we’re working to fix this broken system so it rewards the hard work of middle class Americans and small businesses that play by the rules instead of the big bankers that abused the system to get ahead.  Results: 49% convincing, 49% not convincing.  Intensity: 17% very convincing.Even before the financial crisis the economy wasn’t working for too many middle class Americans. That’s why we are working to rebalance the economy to make sure it works for regular Americans by asking the very wealthy and big corporations to pay their fair share while cutting taxes and reducing health care costs for working families and small businesses and creating quality, middle class jobs in alternative energy.  Results: 54% convincing, 44% not convincing.  Intensity: 26% very convincing.

 

The financial crisis showed that our economy was too reliant on unsustainable financial bubbles. We are working to change that and lay the groundwork for true long-term prosperity by reforming health care to bring down costs for business and consumers and making America the leader in alternative energy like wind and solar so the jobs and industries of the future are built right here, not in China or India.  Results: 53% very convincing, 45% not very convincing.  Intensity: 21% very convincing. 

 

So, some of the Dem messages had majority resonance, but generally we look for intensity numbers of 30% or higher.  None of those six messages reached 30%, although it is easy to see which messages worked better than others.  Now, look at the intensity on the four GOP messages they tested:

The Democrats said all of their spending would create jobs, but their trillion-dollar stimulus plan, four-trillion-dollar budget and government bailouts have created more debt than at any other time in our history and yet unemployment is still rising and will soon top 10 percent. And they want to pay for all of this by making middle class Americans pay higher taxes on everything from energy to health care.  Results: 53% convincing, 44% not convincing.  Intensity: 35% very convincing. 

The Democrats in Congress are more interested in bailing out Detroit, Wall Street and the housing industry with taxpayers’ dollars than they are in helping regular Americans during these difficult times. Democrats even let insurance giant AIG use taxpayer dollars to give millions in bonuses to its top executives. It’s time Democrats start helping out Americans on Main Street, not Wall Street.  Results: 55% convincing, 42% not convincing.  Intensity: 28% very convincing.

Democrats in Congress have approved 5 trillion dollars in spending this year alone, adding over a trillion dollars to our deficit that will leave mountains of debt for our grandchildren to pay back, money that America is borrowing from China and the Middle East. This irresponsible, wasteful spending undermines our economic stability by forcing us to rely on hostile foreign governments to lend us money.  Results: 58% convincing, 40% not convincing.  Intensity: 32% very convincing.

Our economy is in a severe recession but the Democrats only solution is greater government control. The federal government runs General Motors and has nationalized several banks. Democrats say they’re doing what it takes to get our economy back on track but what they’re really doing is pushing us on a path toward socialism, increasing the size of our federal government to levels only seen in European countries.  Results: 52% convincing, 47% not convincing.  Intensity: 33% very convincing.  

The GOP message with the least pushback focuses on the spending/debt moves by the Dems in Congress,making us more beholden to China and the Middle East.  The GOP message with the most intensity ties together the stimulus, the bailouts, the budgets, and the rising unemployment.  I addressed part of this a couple of months or so ago in this post.  And, Resurgent Republic does a nice job of exploring the political impact of the deficit in some August focus groups that I was involved with.

Continuing on a theme of mine, I would also note that one of the two strongest Dem messages includes alternative energy jobs.  As this past post points out, oil and coal by themselves are not an energy plan.  Republicans need to include alternative energy in our messaging on that issue.  Green jobs are the future — and an agenda that includes more oil, more coal (in certain areas) and more alternative energy is a stronger message than the Dem alt energy only line.

 

 

Similar Articles

  • Is social media your friend or a frenemy?
    read more

  • Trump’s numbers tied for his peak high as impeachment talk looms
    read more

  • Independents Key to Trump Approval Boost
    read more

  • Looking at ideology by party over the last thirty years
    read more

  • In NBC/WSJ Data, President Trump Has Solid Standing in Key Trump Counties
    read more

Public Opinion Strategies helped us to clarify what we wanted to learn and then conducted research and analysis that shed light even beyond the questions we set out to ask. They were very receptive to our suggestions, responsive to our queries, and flexible when we needed them to be.

Public Opinion Strategies has consistently offered unparalleled advice and spot-on polling that has shaped how and where we spent money and deploy key resources. Additionally, they have always been an excellent steward of limited campaign resources, ensuring we spend wisely and not a dollar more than necessary in order to get the information we need.

Robert Blizzard and Public Opinion Strategies did a great job for us throughout our successful campaign for Congress. Robert gave us accurate data, spot on analysis, and professional advice, all of which were essential to our victory.

Public Opinion Strategies is one of our go-to pollsters when it comes to testing public support for bond ballot measures and other initiative proposals. They are available to provide ongoing consultation with regard to crafting of ballot questions, public outreach messaging, and related efforts.

ACLI has worked with Public Opinion Strategies for decades, through several tough industry battles—often ones in which public opinion does not naturally fall on the side of insurers. Yet Bill and his team consistently provide invaluable strategic advice by refining our messages and helping us frame our issues in a way that makes them understandable and persuasive.

The data from Public Opinion Strategies provided important insight and informed our public awareness campaign. We sincerely appreciate their professionalism and expertise in this arena.

Nicole McCleskey and the team at Public Opinion Strategies have been invaluable to me, both during my campaigns and as Governor of the State of New Mexico. It’s not just the accuracy of their numbers, but guiding the overall strategy that makes them so valuable.

Public Opinion Strategies has been a part of our team in Missouri for more than a decade. With their data and guidance, Republicans here were able to attain a majority in the House in 2002 for the first time in fifty years, and we have been able to grow that majority to the point that we now have a record, veto-proof majority.

In my tenure at two leading business associations, facing huge and complex consumer issues, I have benefitted enormously from the objective advisory skills of Bill and his team. They do their homework, they are rigorous, dispassionate and thoughtful. Turning questions into answers is a clever tag, but it’s also an apt description of the professional talents of the firm.

I consider Public Opinion Strategies to be a part of our team. That is the way we have always worked. They have helped us to understand our needs and fashioned research solutions to meet those needs. They have helped us to meet killer deadlines by being flexible, executing rapidly, and insuring quality. Teamwork is the best way to describe it.

Accuracy, speed, and deep knowledge of key issues and public sentiment are the hallmarks of quality opinion research, and on these measures Public Opinion Strategies consistently delivers. I have had the pleasure of working with Public Opinion Strategies for more than 15 years on dozens of issues, and they are undoubtedly the gold standard.

Public Opinion Strategies’ track record of success and wealth of experience in political campaigns and issue advocacy are why they are one of the most trusted and well respected public opinion firms in Washington, D.C. Their insights and perspectives have helped to inform a wide array of public affairs activities across multiple industries.