Cell-Phone-Only Voters in the 2008 Exit Poll

The American Association for Public Opinion Research held its annual conference a few weeks ago in Hollywood, FL. Unfortunately, I could not attend, but several of the presentations from the conference and interviews are posted on the web.

One of the presentations focused on the cell-phone-only voters from data collected in the 2008 exit poll. Michael Mokrzycki, the polling director for the Associated Press, which is member of the National Election Pool (NEP), along with Scott Keeter of the Pew Research Center, Courtney Kennedy of the University of Michigan, and The Everett Group, presented a report focused on the following three topics:

1. Cell-phone-only (CPO) incidence and rate of growth
2. How do CPO voters differ from landline-reachable?
3.Bias implications for future surveys that don’t attempt to cover the wireless-only population

The NEP question in the 2004 and 2008 exit polls was:

What type of telephone service is there in your home that you could use or be reached on?

Both regular land-line and cell phone service
Only regular land-line phone service
Only cell phone service
No telephone service at home

In 2004, just 385 of the exit poll interviews out of 5,619 were with CPO-voters, or around 7%. But in 2008, 20% of voters in the exit poll were CPO-voters (1,496 out of 7,341).  Note: these interviews are based only on election day voters.

Cell-phone-only voters backed Obama by large margins (38% McCain/61% Obama). The Presidential ballot among CPO-voters in 2004 was 44% Bush/54% Kerry. CPO-voters in 2008 were twice as likely as landline voters to be voting in their first election. This is largely due to the fact that CPO-voters are younger than landline voters and younger voters are more likely to be first time voters.

Much has been written about the 2008 voter contact programs of the Presidential campaigns, but was there any difference in their reach by phone status? The results from the exit poll data show cell-only-voters were much less likely to have been contacted by either campaign. 74% of CPO said they were NOT contacted by either campaign, versus 56% of land-line voters.

The report noted, “Even Obama’s campaign – renowned for its technological innovation – was more likely to contact landline reachable than CPO-voters – 34% of landline-reachable reported contact from Obama campaign, versus 23% of CPO.”

Reaching cell-phone-only voters is not only an issue for pollsters, but also an issue for campaigns when they are deciding ways to communicate their messages.

Similar Articles

  • Americans See China And Russia As Adversaries Posing Two Different Threats
    read more

  • A New Look At Ideology
    read more

  • Is social media your friend or a frenemy?
    read more

  • Trump’s numbers tied for his peak high as impeachment talk looms
    read more

  • Independents Key to Trump Approval Boost
    read more

Public Opinion Strategies helped us to clarify what we wanted to learn and then conducted research and analysis that shed light even beyond the questions we set out to ask. They were very receptive to our suggestions, responsive to our queries, and flexible when we needed them to be.

Public Opinion Strategies has consistently offered unparalleled advice and spot-on polling that has shaped how and where we spent money and deploy key resources. Additionally, they have always been an excellent steward of limited campaign resources, ensuring we spend wisely and not a dollar more than necessary in order to get the information we need.

Robert Blizzard and Public Opinion Strategies did a great job for us throughout our successful campaign for Congress. Robert gave us accurate data, spot on analysis, and professional advice, all of which were essential to our victory.

Public Opinion Strategies is one of our go-to pollsters when it comes to testing public support for bond ballot measures and other initiative proposals. They are available to provide ongoing consultation with regard to crafting of ballot questions, public outreach messaging, and related efforts.

ACLI has worked with Public Opinion Strategies for decades, through several tough industry battles—often ones in which public opinion does not naturally fall on the side of insurers. Yet Bill and his team consistently provide invaluable strategic advice by refining our messages and helping us frame our issues in a way that makes them understandable and persuasive.

The data from Public Opinion Strategies provided important insight and informed our public awareness campaign. We sincerely appreciate their professionalism and expertise in this arena.

Nicole McCleskey and the team at Public Opinion Strategies have been invaluable to me, both during my campaigns and as Governor of the State of New Mexico. It’s not just the accuracy of their numbers, but guiding the overall strategy that makes them so valuable.

Public Opinion Strategies has been a part of our team in Missouri for more than a decade. With their data and guidance, Republicans here were able to attain a majority in the House in 2002 for the first time in fifty years, and we have been able to grow that majority to the point that we now have a record, veto-proof majority.

In my tenure at two leading business associations, facing huge and complex consumer issues, I have benefitted enormously from the objective advisory skills of Bill and his team. They do their homework, they are rigorous, dispassionate and thoughtful. Turning questions into answers is a clever tag, but it’s also an apt description of the professional talents of the firm.

I consider Public Opinion Strategies to be a part of our team. That is the way we have always worked. They have helped us to understand our needs and fashioned research solutions to meet those needs. They have helped us to meet killer deadlines by being flexible, executing rapidly, and insuring quality. Teamwork is the best way to describe it.

Accuracy, speed, and deep knowledge of key issues and public sentiment are the hallmarks of quality opinion research, and on these measures Public Opinion Strategies consistently delivers. I have had the pleasure of working with Public Opinion Strategies for more than 15 years on dozens of issues, and they are undoubtedly the gold standard.

Public Opinion Strategies’ track record of success and wealth of experience in political campaigns and issue advocacy are why they are one of the most trusted and well respected public opinion firms in Washington, D.C. Their insights and perspectives have helped to inform a wide array of public affairs activities across multiple industries.

Social Media Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com