An In-Depth Look At The Generic Ballot

Last week, I posted a couple of entries looking at the tightening of the generic ballot (in comparison to 2005-2008) despite the challenges that remain for the GOP.  This post looks at key subgroups — other than GOPers, Independents, and Dems (they were covered last week) — on the generic ballot.

The most striking finding is the huge gender gap — men vote GOP by a 48%-33% margin, while women break 31% GOP/50% Dem.  That’s a staggering 34 point gender gap.   The fact that there is a gender gap is not news — it’s been around since at least the 1980s.  However, a gap of more than 25 points is unusual, and 30+ points is staggering.

Looking just at white voters, the gender gap is 29 points, with white men voting strongly GOP (53%-28%), while white women are close (37%-41%).

The gender gap cross generational lines.  It is 39 points with 18-34 year olds, 34 points with 35-54 year olds, and 33 points with 55+ers.   Of further concern to GOPers is that we are losing younger women by 40 points, but also trailing 41%-42% among younger men.  Much has been written about our challenges with younger voters — it is a problem that applies to both women AND men.

Another way to look at the gender gap is to look at education.   Men with college degrees are voting 53%-27% for the GOPer.  Women with college degrees break 35% GOP/47% Dem — a 38 point gap.  Men without college degrees stay with the GOP by a 44%-39% margin, while women without college degress are strongly anti-Republican — 28% GOP/53% Dem. 

By income, Republicans do their best with women over $80k, while Dems actually lead among men with less than $40k. 

Regionally, the GOP is seeing some improvement in the Midwest, but still has major problems in the Northeast.  The Northeast goes Democratic on the generic ballo by 15 points, while the Midwest is tied.  The South remains good (43% GOP/38% Dem), while the West breaks 41% GOP/46% Dem — an improvement from 2008.

Ideologically, conservatives break 65% GOP/21% Dem, while liberals are united (6% GOP/78% Dem).  Moderates provide the Dems with a huge boost, breaking 27% GOP/48% Dem.  Before anyone concludes from the greater unity among liberals that conservatives aren’t unified, it’s important to recognize that liberals are only 16% of the electorate, compared to 42% being conservative.  Thus, the 78% Dems get from libs isn’t anywhere close to the 65% that GOPers get from conservative voters.

Church attendance continues to be a solid predictor of vote.  Among those who attend weekly or more often, the GOPer wins 47%-35%.  Among voters who occasionally attend church, it breaks 35% GOP/42% Dem.  Those who may go a couple times each year (or never), the margin is a wide 32% GOP/51% Dem.

It’s hard to argue about the data — but it’s easy to argue about what the data means.  A couple of conclusions for Republican campaigns going into 2009/10 elections:

  • Women are a key target group.  We can’t expect to win them, but we do need to improve significantly with women.   Keeping the Dem margin down among women often means a GOP win.
  • Younger voters are so anti-GOP that individual candidates need to work extra hard to win them over.  The approach (at this point) shouldn’t be to get them to vote GOP, but to get them to vote for individual Republicans.

GOP campaigns shouldn’t expect to win either group (women or younger voters), but we also can’t expect to get blown out among those two groups and win.  Targeting and messaging to both groups should be a key priority.

Similar Articles

  • Independents Key to Trump Approval Boost
    read more

  • Looking at ideology by party over the last thirty years
    read more

  • In NBC/WSJ Data, President Trump Has Solid Standing in Key Trump Counties
    read more

  • Record 2018 turnout is powered by an “easy” voting experience
    read more

  • A Year-to-Year Look At President Trump’s Approval Rating
    read more

Public Opinion Strategies helped us to clarify what we wanted to learn and then conducted research and analysis that shed light even beyond the questions we set out to ask. They were very receptive to our suggestions, responsive to our queries, and flexible when we needed them to be.

Public Opinion Strategies has consistently offered unparalleled advice and spot-on polling that has shaped how and where we spent money and deploy key resources. Additionally, they have always been an excellent steward of limited campaign resources, ensuring we spend wisely and not a dollar more than necessary in order to get the information we need.

Robert Blizzard and Public Opinion Strategies did a great job for us throughout our successful campaign for Congress. Robert gave us accurate data, spot on analysis, and professional advice, all of which were essential to our victory.

Public Opinion Strategies is one of our go-to pollsters when it comes to testing public support for bond ballot measures and other initiative proposals. They are available to provide ongoing consultation with regard to crafting of ballot questions, public outreach messaging, and related efforts.

ACLI has worked with Public Opinion Strategies for decades, through several tough industry battles—often ones in which public opinion does not naturally fall on the side of insurers. Yet Bill and his team consistently provide invaluable strategic advice by refining our messages and helping us frame our issues in a way that makes them understandable and persuasive.

The data from Public Opinion Strategies provided important insight and informed our public awareness campaign. We sincerely appreciate their professionalism and expertise in this arena.

Nicole McCleskey and the team at Public Opinion Strategies have been invaluable to me, both during my campaigns and as Governor of the State of New Mexico. It’s not just the accuracy of their numbers, but guiding the overall strategy that makes them so valuable.

Public Opinion Strategies has been a part of our team in Missouri for more than a decade. With their data and guidance, Republicans here were able to attain a majority in the House in 2002 for the first time in fifty years, and we have been able to grow that majority to the point that we now have a record, veto-proof majority.

In my tenure at two leading business associations, facing huge and complex consumer issues, I have benefitted enormously from the objective advisory skills of Bill and his team. They do their homework, they are rigorous, dispassionate and thoughtful. Turning questions into answers is a clever tag, but it’s also an apt description of the professional talents of the firm.

I consider Public Opinion Strategies to be a part of our team. That is the way we have always worked. They have helped us to understand our needs and fashioned research solutions to meet those needs. They have helped us to meet killer deadlines by being flexible, executing rapidly, and insuring quality. Teamwork is the best way to describe it.

Accuracy, speed, and deep knowledge of key issues and public sentiment are the hallmarks of quality opinion research, and on these measures Public Opinion Strategies consistently delivers. I have had the pleasure of working with Public Opinion Strategies for more than 15 years on dozens of issues, and they are undoubtedly the gold standard.

Public Opinion Strategies’ track record of success and wealth of experience in political campaigns and issue advocacy are why they are one of the most trusted and well respected public opinion firms in Washington, D.C. Their insights and perspectives have helped to inform a wide array of public affairs activities across multiple industries.