A Reversal on U.S. Military Intervention

For the past several years, Americans have become increasingly hesitant or resistant to military intervention in foreign conflicts. However, after seeing the rise of the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria, Americans have deviated from previous sentiments. According to a new NBC/Wall Street Journal poll, 34{09f965da52dc6ab4c1643a77bd40d1f729d807040cd8db540234bb981a782222} of Americans believe U.S. military action against ISIS should include both air strikes and combat troops, while another 40{09f965da52dc6ab4c1643a77bd40d1f729d807040cd8db540234bb981a782222} believe any action should be limited to air strikes only. Only 15{09f965da52dc6ab4c1643a77bd40d1f729d807040cd8db540234bb981a782222} say no military action should be taken (NBC/WSJ poll, September 2014).

So, what changed?

As we have seen from past conflicts, perceptions of national interest or security are key indicators as to whether Americans will support military intervention.  For example, in August 2013, only 21{09f965da52dc6ab4c1643a77bd40d1f729d807040cd8db540234bb981a782222} of Americans believed taking military action against the Syrian government was in our national interest, and 50{09f965da52dc6ab4c1643a77bd40d1f729d807040cd8db540234bb981a782222} of Americans said no military action should be taken (NBC News, August 2013). This is a far cry from where we are today, as 61{09f965da52dc6ab4c1643a77bd40d1f729d807040cd8db540234bb981a782222} now say action against ISIS is in our national interest and only a small number of Americans oppose any sort of intervention.

This shift in perceptions of national interest is at least partially due to the recent executions of American journalists, as awareness of the ISIS beheadings of American journalists is a driving factor into how Americans assess the ISIS threat.

For a constituency not always fully engaged in world affairs, fully 94{09f965da52dc6ab4c1643a77bd40d1f729d807040cd8db540234bb981a782222} of Americans have seen, read, or heard “a lot” or at least “some” about the executions. However, as seen on the chart below, the more Americans have heard about the atrocities committed by the terrorist group, the more likely they are to indicate it is in our national interest to pursue military action.

chart 1

This split is not a result of partisan influences. The party breaks are on par by those who have seen, heard or heard “a lot” about the executions and those less aware.

Chart 2

In fact, awareness of the beheadings has the same impact on perceptions of national interest for both Republicans and Democrats.

chart 3

Further, awareness of the executions influences nearly all other foreign policy measures. The table below shows that those who have seen “a lot” about the beheadings are more likely to support the U.S. taking a more active role in world affairs and also feel less secure.

chart 4

As the U.S. expands airstrikes into Syria, these data indicates that Americans have more of a willingness to be proactive in the fight against ISIS than other world conflicts we have seen in recent years (i.e. Israel/Gaza, Ukraine, Syria/Assad, and Afghanistan). Americans perceive ISIS to be a threat to their national interest/security and the more they are aware of the barbaric acts of aggression against Americans and other Westerners, the more inclined they are to support military intervention.

Similar Articles

  • Republicans and the 2020 Election
    read more

  • Jarrett Lewis Named New Partner at Public Opinion Strategies
    read more

  • Watch: Bill McInturff on “Meet the Press”
    read more

  • Did you make New Year’s Resolutions?
    read more

  • George Nassar Named New Partner at Public Opinion Strategies
    read more

Public Opinion Strategies helped us to clarify what we wanted to learn and then conducted research and analysis that shed light even beyond the questions we set out to ask. They were very receptive to our suggestions, responsive to our queries, and flexible when we needed them to be.

Public Opinion Strategies has consistently offered unparalleled advice and spot-on polling that has shaped how and where we spent money and deploy key resources. Additionally, they have always been an excellent steward of limited campaign resources, ensuring we spend wisely and not a dollar more than necessary in order to get the information we need.

Robert Blizzard and Public Opinion Strategies did a great job for us throughout our successful campaign for Congress. Robert gave us accurate data, spot on analysis, and professional advice, all of which were essential to our victory.

Public Opinion Strategies is one of our go-to pollsters when it comes to testing public support for bond ballot measures and other initiative proposals. They are available to provide ongoing consultation with regard to crafting of ballot questions, public outreach messaging, and related efforts.

ACLI has worked with Public Opinion Strategies for decades, through several tough industry battles—often ones in which public opinion does not naturally fall on the side of insurers. Yet Bill and his team consistently provide invaluable strategic advice by refining our messages and helping us frame our issues in a way that makes them understandable and persuasive.

The data from Public Opinion Strategies provided important insight and informed our public awareness campaign. We sincerely appreciate their professionalism and expertise in this arena.

Nicole McCleskey and the team at Public Opinion Strategies have been invaluable to me, both during my campaigns and as Governor of the State of New Mexico. It’s not just the accuracy of their numbers, but guiding the overall strategy that makes them so valuable.

Public Opinion Strategies has been a part of our team in Missouri for more than a decade. With their data and guidance, Republicans here were able to attain a majority in the House in 2002 for the first time in fifty years, and we have been able to grow that majority to the point that we now have a record, veto-proof majority.

In my tenure at two leading business associations, facing huge and complex consumer issues, I have benefitted enormously from the objective advisory skills of Bill and his team. They do their homework, they are rigorous, dispassionate and thoughtful. Turning questions into answers is a clever tag, but it’s also an apt description of the professional talents of the firm.

I consider Public Opinion Strategies to be a part of our team. That is the way we have always worked. They have helped us to understand our needs and fashioned research solutions to meet those needs. They have helped us to meet killer deadlines by being flexible, executing rapidly, and insuring quality. Teamwork is the best way to describe it.

Accuracy, speed, and deep knowledge of key issues and public sentiment are the hallmarks of quality opinion research, and on these measures Public Opinion Strategies consistently delivers. I have had the pleasure of working with Public Opinion Strategies for more than 15 years on dozens of issues, and they are undoubtedly the gold standard.

Public Opinion Strategies’ track record of success and wealth of experience in political campaigns and issue advocacy are why they are one of the most trusted and well respected public opinion firms in Washington, D.C. Their insights and perspectives have helped to inform a wide array of public affairs activities across multiple industries.

Social Media Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com