Three Quick Blog Posts In One!

Rather than writing multiple short blog posts, here are some quick hits:

Delusional Democrats 

I have been asking likely voters in general surveys which party controls Washington. The results have been staggeringly consistent no matter where the survey is completed. Approximately one-third say the Democrats control Washington, one-third say the Republicans do(!), ten percent say both/neither, and approximately one quarter do not know.

What’s most interesting about the results is that a consistent two-thirds to three-quarters of Democrats say Republicans control Washington. Huh? Wow. Democrats are so delusional on this they believe that since the country has major problems, Republicans must be in control. John Boehner and the House GOP are doing a good job, but to think they have more power than Barack Obama and Harry Reid combined is to be disconnected with reality.

That’s what happens when you are not happy with the direction of the country, but do not want to blame your own team even though they deserve it – this is a great example of political cognitive dissonance.

Buckle Your Seat Belts 

Despite the press meme (not all, just many) that Barack Obama is cruising toward re-election and the presidential die is cast, a look back at recent presidential elections suggests wild swings in the ballot await.

The best stat in the NCAA tournament (other than the two 15-2 upset victories are by schools from states with Republican Governors over states with Democratic Governors) is the number of tie or lead changes in close games. So, it’s worthwhile looking back at the number of tie or lead changes in Presidential campaigns.

Using the Gallup tracking in Presidential elections going back to 1992, here are the number of ties or lead changes in recent campaigns:

                                                                                                   Ties/Lead Changes

2008                                                                                                          24

2004                                                                                                          12

2000                                                                                                          16

1996                                                                                                             0

1992                                                                                                             6

The 1990s were relatively dull. Anyhow, the last three elections make the case that there will be quite a few swings in momentum between now and November.

Republican Incumbents in Primaries 

House Republicans who are being challenged by challengers have no doubt learned to take their opponents seriously – between the loss by Jean Schmidt and the under 60% scores for three southern incumbents – there is plenty of evidence that GOP voters are restive. For commentators wondering why the GOP is base-focused right now, there’s the reason. Many members of Congress are more at risk in a primary than a general election, so they are paying heed to their right flank.

In evaluating GOP House incumbents, Republican primary voters are looking for consistent conservatives who vote against Barack Obama – and were sufficiently conservative during George W. Bush’s Administration as well. GOP incumbents are presumed guilty of having “gone Washington” unless they can prove they have not. Negative messages against House incumbents in primaries are getting traction, unless the Republican incumbent is out there beating those negative messages down with a counter message that boosts their conservative bona fides – a message with an edge. Now is not the time for soft and fuzzy. It is a time for edgy and forceful.

Similar Articles

  • Independents Key to Trump Approval Boost
    read more

  • Looking at ideology by party over the last thirty years
    read more

  • In NBC/WSJ Data, President Trump Has Solid Standing in Key Trump Counties
    read more

  • Record 2018 turnout is powered by an “easy” voting experience
    read more

  • A Year-to-Year Look At President Trump’s Approval Rating
    read more

Public Opinion Strategies helped us to clarify what we wanted to learn and then conducted research and analysis that shed light even beyond the questions we set out to ask. They were very receptive to our suggestions, responsive to our queries, and flexible when we needed them to be.

Public Opinion Strategies has consistently offered unparalleled advice and spot-on polling that has shaped how and where we spent money and deploy key resources. Additionally, they have always been an excellent steward of limited campaign resources, ensuring we spend wisely and not a dollar more than necessary in order to get the information we need.

Robert Blizzard and Public Opinion Strategies did a great job for us throughout our successful campaign for Congress. Robert gave us accurate data, spot on analysis, and professional advice, all of which were essential to our victory.

Public Opinion Strategies is one of our go-to pollsters when it comes to testing public support for bond ballot measures and other initiative proposals. They are available to provide ongoing consultation with regard to crafting of ballot questions, public outreach messaging, and related efforts.

ACLI has worked with Public Opinion Strategies for decades, through several tough industry battles—often ones in which public opinion does not naturally fall on the side of insurers. Yet Bill and his team consistently provide invaluable strategic advice by refining our messages and helping us frame our issues in a way that makes them understandable and persuasive.

The data from Public Opinion Strategies provided important insight and informed our public awareness campaign. We sincerely appreciate their professionalism and expertise in this arena.

Nicole McCleskey and the team at Public Opinion Strategies have been invaluable to me, both during my campaigns and as Governor of the State of New Mexico. It’s not just the accuracy of their numbers, but guiding the overall strategy that makes them so valuable.

Public Opinion Strategies has been a part of our team in Missouri for more than a decade. With their data and guidance, Republicans here were able to attain a majority in the House in 2002 for the first time in fifty years, and we have been able to grow that majority to the point that we now have a record, veto-proof majority.

In my tenure at two leading business associations, facing huge and complex consumer issues, I have benefitted enormously from the objective advisory skills of Bill and his team. They do their homework, they are rigorous, dispassionate and thoughtful. Turning questions into answers is a clever tag, but it’s also an apt description of the professional talents of the firm.

I consider Public Opinion Strategies to be a part of our team. That is the way we have always worked. They have helped us to understand our needs and fashioned research solutions to meet those needs. They have helped us to meet killer deadlines by being flexible, executing rapidly, and insuring quality. Teamwork is the best way to describe it.

Accuracy, speed, and deep knowledge of key issues and public sentiment are the hallmarks of quality opinion research, and on these measures Public Opinion Strategies consistently delivers. I have had the pleasure of working with Public Opinion Strategies for more than 15 years on dozens of issues, and they are undoubtedly the gold standard.

Public Opinion Strategies’ track record of success and wealth of experience in political campaigns and issue advocacy are why they are one of the most trusted and well respected public opinion firms in Washington, D.C. Their insights and perspectives have helped to inform a wide array of public affairs activities across multiple industries.