2012 Romney Voters and 2016 Trump Voters Diverge Demographically But Prefer a Republican-Controlled Congress

In our efforts to continue to understand the 2016 cycle, we created a three-way split of voters based on their self-reported 2012 presidential vote and their response to the 4-way 2016 presidential ballot question across the surveys conducted for NBC-WSJ since June 2016. As a note, we didn’t exclude anyone based on partisanship in this run.

The three groups were:

  1. Romney+Trump: Any voter who said they would vote for Trump and also reported voting for Romney in 2012
  2. Trump NOT Romney: Any voter who said they would vote for Trump but did NOT vote for Romney (We allowed those who said they “didn’t vote” in 2012 filter into this group)
  3. Romney NOT Trump: Any voter who said they would NOT vote for Trump but did vote for Romney

Romney+Trump voters are 24% of voters overall and 56% of all Republican/leaners.

  • Overall, their party ID is 64% GOP – 3% Dem – 39% Lean/Ind.
  • They mirror the overall population in terms of education and geography.
  • They are the oldest (55% over 55 years old) of the three cohorts.
  • But, they are more heavily concentrated in the South (41%).
  • These are the MOST likely voters of the three cohorts to describe themselves as Evangelical Christians (33%).
  • They view the GOP the best – 60% Pos/23% Neut/16% Neg.
  • Over 70% have a positive opinion of Trump
  • Overwhelmingly prefer a GOP-Controlled Congress (94% GOP – 1% Dem).
  • They view Paul Ryan positively by two to one (43% Pos/29% Neut/21% Neg)

Trump NOT Romney voters are 11% of voters overall and 19% of all Republican/leaners.

  • Overall, their party ID is 43% GOP – 9% Dem – 40% Lean/Ind.
  • They are the second oldest (38% over 55 years old) of the three cohorts.
  • They are the most Rural (20%) and the least well-educated (76% Less than College).
  • They are also more heavily concentrated in the South (40%).
  • These are the LEAST likely of the three cohorts to be self-described Evangelical Christians (20%).
  • They view the GOP well – 52% Pos/29% Neut/18% Neg.
  • Seventy percent (70%) have a positive opinion of Trump.
  • They strongly prefer a GOP-Controlled Congress (76% GOP – 11% Dem).
  • They view Paul Ryan positively but only by a narrow margin (30% Pos/27% Neut/25% Neg).
  • Thirty-eight percent (38%) of these voters say they did not vote in the 2012 presidential election.

Romney NOT Trump voters are 8% of voters overall and 13% of all Republican/leaners.

  • Overall, their party ID is 40% GOP – 7% Dem – 43% Lean/Ind.
  • They are the youngest of the three cohorts (52% under 45 years old and 32% under 35 years old).
  • They tend to be non-rural (11% Rural, 60% Suburban, 28% Urban), and are more likely to be college graduates (31%) than the other groups.
  • Just 30% of these voters are from the South.
  • Just 24% of these voters are self-described Evangelical Christians.
  • They view the GOP very badly – 24% Pos/28% Neut/48% Neg.
  • Seventy-seven percent (77%) have a negative opinion of Trump.
  • But STILL this group very strongly prefers a GOP-Controlled Congress (75% GOP – 15% Dem).
  • They view Paul Ryan positively by more than two to one (47% Pos/25% Neut/13% Neg*). * Data based on 94 interviews.

Bottom Line

There is certainly a chunk of voters who are unique to Trump’s candidacy and another that Romney attracted that Trump has not. But, regardless of how these voters might vote on the top of the ticket, they overwhelmingly prefer a Republican-controlled Congress.

*The NBCWSJ poll is conducted by the firms of Public Opinion Strategies and Hart Research Associates. The views expressed in this blog are those of Micah Roberts and not necessarily shared by Hart Research Associates or NBC News and the Wall Street Journal.
Similar Articles

  • Independents Key to Trump Approval Boost
    read more

  • Looking at ideology by party over the last thirty years
    read more

  • In NBC/WSJ Data, President Trump Has Solid Standing in Key Trump Counties
    read more

  • Record 2018 turnout is powered by an “easy” voting experience
    read more

  • A Year-to-Year Look At President Trump’s Approval Rating
    read more

Public Opinion Strategies helped us to clarify what we wanted to learn and then conducted research and analysis that shed light even beyond the questions we set out to ask. They were very receptive to our suggestions, responsive to our queries, and flexible when we needed them to be.

Public Opinion Strategies has consistently offered unparalleled advice and spot-on polling that has shaped how and where we spent money and deploy key resources. Additionally, they have always been an excellent steward of limited campaign resources, ensuring we spend wisely and not a dollar more than necessary in order to get the information we need.

Robert Blizzard and Public Opinion Strategies did a great job for us throughout our successful campaign for Congress. Robert gave us accurate data, spot on analysis, and professional advice, all of which were essential to our victory.

Public Opinion Strategies is one of our go-to pollsters when it comes to testing public support for bond ballot measures and other initiative proposals. They are available to provide ongoing consultation with regard to crafting of ballot questions, public outreach messaging, and related efforts.

ACLI has worked with Public Opinion Strategies for decades, through several tough industry battles—often ones in which public opinion does not naturally fall on the side of insurers. Yet Bill and his team consistently provide invaluable strategic advice by refining our messages and helping us frame our issues in a way that makes them understandable and persuasive.

The data from Public Opinion Strategies provided important insight and informed our public awareness campaign. We sincerely appreciate their professionalism and expertise in this arena.

Nicole McCleskey and the team at Public Opinion Strategies have been invaluable to me, both during my campaigns and as Governor of the State of New Mexico. It’s not just the accuracy of their numbers, but guiding the overall strategy that makes them so valuable.

Public Opinion Strategies has been a part of our team in Missouri for more than a decade. With their data and guidance, Republicans here were able to attain a majority in the House in 2002 for the first time in fifty years, and we have been able to grow that majority to the point that we now have a record, veto-proof majority.

In my tenure at two leading business associations, facing huge and complex consumer issues, I have benefitted enormously from the objective advisory skills of Bill and his team. They do their homework, they are rigorous, dispassionate and thoughtful. Turning questions into answers is a clever tag, but it’s also an apt description of the professional talents of the firm.

I consider Public Opinion Strategies to be a part of our team. That is the way we have always worked. They have helped us to understand our needs and fashioned research solutions to meet those needs. They have helped us to meet killer deadlines by being flexible, executing rapidly, and insuring quality. Teamwork is the best way to describe it.

Accuracy, speed, and deep knowledge of key issues and public sentiment are the hallmarks of quality opinion research, and on these measures Public Opinion Strategies consistently delivers. I have had the pleasure of working with Public Opinion Strategies for more than 15 years on dozens of issues, and they are undoubtedly the gold standard.

Public Opinion Strategies’ track record of success and wealth of experience in political campaigns and issue advocacy are why they are one of the most trusted and well respected public opinion firms in Washington, D.C. Their insights and perspectives have helped to inform a wide array of public affairs activities across multiple industries.