What Just Happened: Majority Of Election Night Voters Agree with Trump’s Core Populist Message

In an Election Night Poll of 800 actual voters conducted by Public Opinion Strategies last night we asked voters whether they agree or disagree with the following statement:

“The economic and political systems in the country are stacked against people like me.”

Voters were pretty split with 50% agreeing and 45% disagreeing with this statement. That result was not too surprising. Majorities of voters have agreed with this statement in NBC/WSJ polling going back to 2012. Before that, majorities have agreed sporadically across over two decades of NBC/WSJ tracking this same question.

But, it’s what the data looked like by party that provides a clear and compelling answer to a question many are asking “what just happened?”

On election night, more Republicans, 57%, than Democrats, 42%, agreed that the economic and political systems in the country are stacked against people like them.

This is the answer because this populist sentiment is traditionally a Democratic and liberal one. It’s something that you would be just as likely to hear at a Bernie Sanders rally or find woven into a speech delivered by Former President Bill Clinton in the 90’s – “I feel your pain.”

It is a sentiment that has consistently and strongly resonated, understandably, with African-Americans, the less well-educated, and lower income households. Whites and better-off Americans have traditionally disagreed. And, largely these race and class divisions in America still exist!

But, even as 64% of African-Americans continued to believe the “system was stacked against them” compared to just 47% of Whites overall, on election night 2016, there was an ideological realignment. Among Conservative Republican voters, 60% agreed the “system was stacked against people like them” while only 42% of Moderate and Liberal Democrats (and 32% of White Democrats) did. A majority (57%) of Independents, importantly, also agree.

The result: Trump won the “stacked against me” voters 52% to Hillary Clinton’s 35%.

As the graphic below shows, this sort of populist swelling in the Republican Party has happened before, and has always been followed by notably positive electoral results:

  • In the summer of 1994 before Speaker Gingrich’s Contract with America gave Republicans and control of the House 46% of Republicans agreed the system was “stacked against” them, compared to just 41% of Democrats.
  • And, in the summer of 2010 as the Tea Party Movement rose up and delivered a huge GOP wave, 50% of Republicans and 43% of Democrats agreed with this statement.
  • Since 2010, Republican majority agreement with this only faltered slightly once, dipping to 49% in August 2012 before Obama won re-election.
  • In the summer of 2014 before Republicans took the Senate, the gap in agreement between the two parties was 1-point. Looking at this gap by party would seem very ominous set of data for Democrats.
  • On election night 2016, majority Republican agreement is the hallmark of Donald Trump’s win in rural America and in the Rust Belt that delivered Republicans the Presidency.
  • There is another important part to this trend. In 1994, and 2010, 2014, and today Independent agreement with the “stacked against me” sentiment matched or was higher than the level of agreement among Republicans, providing the juice needed to deliver victories.

Picture2
Bottom Line
There has long been a “disaffected middle” that can swing to either political party, the Independent voter is a simple and instructive way to capture them in a set of cross –tabs. Republicans have proven able to mobilize these voters to deliver electoral wins that have meaningful and lasting consequence.

Trump’s oft-maligned brand of populism took hold among Republicans and Independents, it forced Democrats to shrink from this traditionally liberal point of view, and defend the system, their candidate’s own political elitism, and the staleness of the status quo.

Share on Facebook0Share on Google+0Tweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedIn5Email this to someone
Similar Articles

  • Could the California Democrat’s Supermajority become their Kryptonite?
    read more

  • Call It A Comeback
    read more

  • No Time to Rest on Our Laurels
    read more

  • Tinfoil Tuesday
    read more

  • What the Q1 CNBC Data Says About Tax Reform
    read more

Public Opinion Strategies helped us to clarify what we wanted to learn and then conducted research and analysis that shed light even beyond the questions we set out to ask. They were very receptive to our suggestions, responsive to our queries, and flexible when we needed them to be.

Public Opinion Strategies has consistently offered unparalleled advice and spot-on polling that has shaped how and where we spent money and deploy key resources. Additionally, they have always been an excellent steward of limited campaign resources, ensuring we spend wisely and not a dollar more than necessary in order to get the information we need.

Robert Blizzard and Public Opinion Strategies did a great job for us throughout our successful campaign for Congress. Robert gave us accurate data, spot on analysis, and professional advice, all of which were essential to our victory.

Public Opinion Strategies is one of our go-to pollsters when it comes to testing public support for bond ballot measures and other initiative proposals. They are available to provide ongoing consultation with regard to crafting of ballot questions, public outreach messaging, and related efforts.

ACLI has worked with Public Opinion Strategies for decades, through several tough industry battles—often ones in which public opinion does not naturally fall on the side of insurers. Yet Bill and his team consistently provide invaluable strategic advice by refining our messages and helping us frame our issues in a way that makes them understandable and persuasive.

The data from Public Opinion Strategies provided important insight and informed our public awareness campaign. We sincerely appreciate their professionalism and expertise in this arena.

Nicole McCleskey and the team at Public Opinion Strategies have been invaluable to me, both during my campaigns and as Governor of the State of New Mexico. It’s not just the accuracy of their numbers, but guiding the overall strategy that makes them so valuable.

Public Opinion Strategies has been a part of our team in Missouri for more than a decade. With their data and guidance, Republicans here were able to attain a majority in the House in 2002 for the first time in fifty years, and we have been able to grow that majority to the point that we now have a record, veto-proof majority.

Lori Weigel from Public Opinion Strategies reviewed our needs and guided us toward asking the right questions. Her reporting was easy to follow and her interpretation of the data provided clear decision points.

In my tenure at two leading business associations, facing huge and complex consumer issues, I have benefitted enormously from the objective advisory skills of Bill and his team. They do their homework, they are rigorous, dispassionate and thoughtful. Turning questions into answers is a clever tag, but it’s also an apt description of the professional talents of the firm.

I consider Public Opinion Strategies to be a part of our team. That is the way we have always worked. They have helped us to understand our needs and fashioned research solutions to meet those needs. They have helped us to meet killer deadlines by being flexible, executing rapidly, and insuring quality. Teamwork is the best way to describe it.

Accuracy, speed, and deep knowledge of key issues and public sentiment are the hallmarks of quality opinion research, and on these measures Public Opinion Strategies consistently delivers. I have had the pleasure of working with Public Opinion Strategies for more than 15 years on dozens of issues, and they are undoubtedly the gold standard.

Public Opinion Strategies’ track record of success and wealth of experience in political campaigns and issue advocacy are why they are one of the most trusted and well respected public opinion firms in Washington, D.C. Their insights and perspectives have helped to inform a wide array of public affairs activities across multiple industries.

Social Media Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com